Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183473›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2015

Impact of bifurcation dual stenting on endothelial shear stress.

Henry Y Chen, Bon-Kwon Koo, Ghassan S Kassab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henry Y ChenCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, Inc., San Diego, California; and.
Bon-Kwon KooDivision of Cardiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ghassan S KassabCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, Inc., San Diego, California; and gkassab@calmi2.org.

Funding

Micro-Mechanical Role of Hypertension in Intimal HyperplasiaR01HL117990 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-117990NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary interventions and the introduction of drug eluding stents, in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis remain a clinically significant problem for bifurcations. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of dual bifurcation stenting on hemodynamic parameters known to influence restenosis and thrombosis. We hypothesized that double stenting, especially with a longer side branch (SB) stent, likely has a negative effect on wall shear stress (WSS), WSS gradient (WSSG), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). To test this hypothesis, we developed computational models of dual stents at bifurcations and non-Newtonian blood simulations. The models were then interfaced, meshed, and solved in a validated finite-element package. Longer and shorter stents at the SB and provisional stenting were compared. It was found that stents placed in the SB at a bifurcation lowered WSS, but elevated WSSG and OSI. Dual stenting with longer SB stent had the most adverse impact on SB endothelial WSS, WSSG, and OSI, with low WSS region up to 50% more than the case with shorter SB stent. The simulations also demonstrated flow disturbances resulting from SB stent struts protruding into the main flow field near the carina, which may have implications on stent thrombosis. The simulations predict a negative hemodynamic role for SB stenting, which is exaggerated with a longer stent, consistent with clinical trial findings that dual-stenting is comparable or inferior to provisional stenting.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryComputer SimulationCoronary VesselsEndothelium, VascularHemodynamicsHumansModels, CardiovascularProsthesis DesignShear StrengthStentsStress, Mechanicaladverse eventsbifurcation dual stentingendothelial shear stressprovisional stentingtarget-vessel revascularization

Identifiers

PMID26183473
PMCPMC4687863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.