ArticleHealth care management science2017
Scheduling elective surgeries: the tradeoff among bed capacity, waiting patients and operating room utilization using goal programming.
Article in Health care management science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Daily Surgical Scheduling Improves Operative Time Consumption: A Retrospective Study.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Domain-Aware Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay from Perioperative Data: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- How does the hospital make a safe and stable elective surgery plan during COVID-19 pandemic?Computers & industrial engineering · 2022Article
- Decision support algorithms for optimizing surgery start times considering the performance variation.Health care management science · 2022Article
- Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units.Health care management science · 2022Article
- Operating Rooms Scheduling for Elective Surgeries in a Hospital Affected by War-Related Incidents.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Atlas is not alone: sharing the burden of clinical challenge.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Admission Control Policies for Surgery Patients.Journal of medical systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scheduling of surgeries in the operating rooms under limited competing resources such as surgical and nursing staff, anesthesiologist, medical equipment, and recovery beds in surgical wards is a complicated process. A well-designed schedule should be concerned with the welfare of the entire system by allocating the available resources in an efficient and effective manner. In this paper, we develop an integer linear programming model in a manner useful for multiple goals for optimally scheduling elective surgeries based on the availability of surgeons and operating rooms over a time horizon. In particular, the model is concerned with the minimization of the following important goals: (1) the anticipated number of patients waiting for service; (2) the underutilization of operating room time; (3) the maximum expected number of patients in the recovery unit; and (4) the expected range (the difference between maximum and minimum expected number) of patients in the recovery unit. We develop two goal programming (GP) models: lexicographic GP model and weighted GP model. The lexicographic GP model schedules operating rooms when various preemptive priority levels are given to these four goals. A numerical study is conducted to illustrate the optimal master-surgery schedule obtained from the models. The numerical results demonstrate that when the available number of surgeons and operating rooms is known without error over the planning horizon, the proposed models can produce good schedules and priority levels and preference weights of four goals affect the resulting schedules. The results quantify the tradeoffs that must take place as the preemptive-weights of the four goals are changed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26183470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.