Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183439›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

Implementation of simple telehealth to manage hypertension in general practice: a service evaluation.

Elizabeth Cottrell, Tracey Cox, Phil O'Connell, Ruth Chambers

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. GP incentives to design hypertension and atrial fibrillation local quality-improvement schemes: a controlled before-after study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth CottrellTrentham Mews Medical Centre, Eastwick Crescent, Trentham, Staffordshire, ST4 8XP, UK. Elizabeth.Cottrell2@northstaffs.nhs.uk.
Tracey CoxNHS Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Herbert Minton Building, 79 London Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7PZ, UK. Tracey.Cox@staffordsurroundsccg.nhs.uk.
Phil O'ConnellNHS Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Herbert Minton Building, 79 London Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7PZ, UK. phil.oconnell@nhssimple.uk.
Ruth ChambersNHS Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group/West Midlands Academic Health Science Network, Herbert Minton Building, 79 London Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7PZ, UK. Ruth.Chambers@stoke.nhs.uk.
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Staffordshire · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is common and conveys significant risk of morbidity and mortality. However, inadequate control of hypertension is common. Following a successful local use of a simple telehealth intervention ('Florence') for the diagnosis and management of hypertension, the Advice & Interactive Messaging (AIM) for Health simple telehealth programme was launched across England in March 2013. Four protocols were developed to diagnose and monitor blood pressure (BP). The aim of this service evaluation was to identify the extent to which predefined service outcomes, regarding ascertainment of a diagnosis of hypertension, and achievement of hypertension control, were met for the hypertension protocols.

methodsPatients with opportunistic raised BP in general practice or diagnosed hypertension were selected by their usual primary care providers to register onto diagnostic or monitoring hypertension protocols, respectively. Florence sent patients prompts via text messaging to submit readings, educational messages and user satisfaction questions. Patient responses were stored on Florence for review by their primary care health providers. This service evaluation used data from 2963 patients from general practices across England registered onto one of four AIM hypertension protocols from inception to January 2014. Data were extracted from Florence and underwent descriptive analysis.

results1166/1468 (79 %) patients were eligible to have a diagnosis of hypertension confirmed/refuted, of which 740 (63 %) had a mean BP in the hypertensive range from one week's readings. BP control was achieved by only 5-22 % of 1495 patients signed up to one of the three monitoring protocols. Patient engagement with the monitoring protocols was initially good but reduced over time.

conclusionsAlthough simple telehealth may be an acceptable tool for diagnosing and monitoring hypertension among responding patient users, and can have a useful role in diagnosis of hypertension (particularly if ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is not possible or is declined), problems were identified. Reduced patient engagement over longer periods and acceptance of suboptimal BP control among patients on monitoring protocols need to be urgently addressed. Empirical work is required to identify barriers to achieving BP control among hypertensive patients using simple telehealth and, consequently, services be developed to address these issues.

Indexed as

HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryClinical ProtocolsEnglandGeneral PracticeHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareProgram EvaluationTelemedicineAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID26183439
PMCPMC4504444
OpenAlexW1748259650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.