Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183241›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health dentistry2016

Tracking workforce diversity in dentistry: importance, methods, and challenges.

Elizabeth Mertz, Cynthia Wides, Alexis Cooke, Paul E Gates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health dentistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Black dentist workforce in the United States.Journal of public health dentistry · 2017
    Article
  8. The Hispanic and Latino dentist workforce in the United States.Journal of public health dentistry · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth MertzPreventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, Center for the Health Professions, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cynthia WidesPreventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, Center for the Health Professions, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alexis CookePreventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, Center for the Health Professions, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Paul E GatesDepartment of Dentistry, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USBronx-Lebanon Hospital Center · US

Funding

New Faculty Development for Research to Reduce Oral Health DisparitiesP30DE020752 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANSKY, STUART A · 2009 to 2010
$1.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS P30 DE020752NIDCR NIH HHS P30DE020752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this paper are to describe sources of data on underrepresented minority (URM) dental providers and to perform a structured critique of primary survey research on African American (AA), Hispanic/Latino (HL), and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) dentists.

methodsA national sample survey was conducted between October 2012 and March 2013, and secondary datasets were assessed for comparability. The survey used 21 sampling frames, with censuses of AI/AN and nonurban dentists, and assessed demographics, education, practice history, patient population, volunteerism, experiences with discrimination, and opinions on issues in dentistry. The survey was developed with constituent input, pilot-tested, and distributed online and through US mail with three reminder postcards, phone, and email follow-up. Continuing education credit and entry to a prize drawing were provided for participation.

resultsExisting data sources cannot answer critical research questions about URM dentists. Using best practices, the survey received a 34 percent adjusted response rate. Selection likelihood and measurable response bias were adjusted for using base and poststratification weights.

conclusionsThe survey design was consistent with best practices, and our response analytics provide high confidence that the survey produced data representative of the URM dentist population. Enhanced study design, content, and response rates of existing survey efforts would be needed to provide a more robust body of knowledge on URM providers, perspectives, and practices.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDentistsEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdata collectiondentistsminority groupsquestionnairessurvey research

Identifiers

PMID26183241
PMCPMC4714954
OpenAlexW1920332385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.