Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183190›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2015

Single cells get together: High-resolution approaches to study the dynamics of early mouse development.

Néstor Saiz, Berenika Plusa, Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Néstor SaizDevelopmental Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Berenika PlusaFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Anna-Katerina HadjantonakisDevelopmental Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: hadj@MSKCC.org.

Funding

Morphogenesis of the paraxial mesoderm in miceR01HD052115 · NICHD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HADJANTONAKIS, ANNA-KATERINA · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Morphogenesis of mammalian gut endodermR01DK084391 · NIDDK · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HADJANTONAKIS, ANNA-KATERINA · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052115NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084391NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK084391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic development is a complex and highly dynamic process during which individual cells interact with one another, adopt different identities and organize themselves in three-dimensional space to generate an entire organism. Recent technical developments in genomics and high-resolution quantitative imaging are making it possible to study cellular populations at single-cell resolution and begin to integrate different inputs, for example genetic, physical and chemical factors, that affect cell differentiation over spatial and temporal scales. The preimplantation mouse embryo allows the analysis of cell fate decisions in vivo with high spatiotemporal resolution. In this review we highlight how the application of live imaging and single-cell resolution analysis pipelines is providing an unprecedented level of insight on the processes that shape the earliest stages of mammalian development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiceReproducibility of ResultsSingle-Cell AnalysisGenomicsLineage specificationMouse embryoQuantitative high-resolution imagingSingle-cell analysisSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26183190
PMCPMC4688173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.