Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183140›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016

Polymicrobial infections reduce the cure rate in prosthetic joint infections: outcome analysis with two-stage exchange and follow-up ≥two years.

Matthias D Wimmer, Max J Friedrich, Thomas M Randau, Milena M Ploeger, Jan Schmolders, Andreas A Strauss, Gunnar T R Hischebeth, Peter H Pennekamp, Patrick Vavken, Sascha Gravius

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The effectiveness of preoperative colon cleansing on post-operative surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predictors of outcome following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. AIMS microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias D WimmerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. wimmer@uni-bonn.de.
Max J FriedrichDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas M RandauDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Milena M PloegerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jan SchmoldersDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas A StraussDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Gunnar T R HischebethInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter H PennekampDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick VavkenDivision of Sports Medicine & Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sascha GraviusDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProsthetic joint infections (PJI) are a serious and challenging complication after total joint arthroplasty. According to the literature, most PJI are monomicrobial infections caused by gram-positive cocci. The number of polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the literature and only limited data are available regarding the outcome of polymicrobial PJI. Our hypothesis was that polymicrobial PJI are associated with a reduced cure rate compared with monomicrobial PJI.

methodsRoutine clinical data were collected and analysed retrospectively as anonymised, aggregated data. A total of 77 consecutive patients with 77 confirmed PJI and proven infectious organism of the hip and knee joint treated within a two-stage exchange concept and a follow-up ≥ two years were investigated. Detection of the infectious organism was based on multiple microbiological cultures taken intra-operatively. Superficial wound swabs or swabs from sinus tracts were not taken into account. Data were grouped into polymicrobial and monomicrobial PJI. The main outcome variable was "definitively free of infection after two years" as published. Second, we considered several variables as potential confounders or as risk factors.

resultsA total of 42 men and 35 women with 46 infected total hip arthroplasties and 31 infected total knee arthroplasties were evaluated. In 37 (46.6 %) of our 77 patients a polymicrobial PJI could be detected. We found a significant association between polymicrobial PJI and the outcome parameter definitively free of infection after two years with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.3 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.1-1.0]. The rate of patients graded as definitively free of infection after two years was 67.6 % for polymicrobial infections vs. 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.062) was identified as a borderline significant covariable.

conclusionsOur data suggest that polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the current literature. Additionally, the presence of multiple infectious organisms is associated with a reduced rate after two years with 67.6 vs 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. Special attention and extra care should be considered for these patients.

Indexed as

AgedArthritisArthroplasty, ReplacementCoinfectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJoint ProsthesisKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsArthroplastyInfectionPolymicrobialProsthetic joint infectionRevision

Identifiers

PMID26183140
OpenAlexW889103409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.