Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183063›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

The tetraspanin web revisited by super-resolution microscopy.

Malou Zuidscherwoude, Fabian Göttfert, Vera Marie E Dunlock, Carl G Figdor, Geert van den Bogaart, Annemiek B van Spriel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. HSPCs and TScience advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Migrasomes: A Novel Target for Cancer Treatment.Current cancer drug targets · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CD9-association with PIPFEBS open bio · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Malou ZuidscherwoudeDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fabian GöttfertDepartment of NanoBiophotonics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Vera Marie E DunlockDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carl G FigdorDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geert van den BogaartDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annemiek B van SprielDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DERadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

European Research Council 269019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial organization of membrane proteins in the plasma membrane is critical for signal transduction, cell communication and membrane trafficking. Tetraspanins organize functional higher-order protein complexes called 'tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs)' via interactions with partner molecules and other tetraspanins. Still, the nanoscale organization of TEMs in native plasma membranes has not been resolved. Here, we elucidated the size, density and distribution of TEMs in the plasma membrane of human B cells and dendritic cells using dual color stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. We demonstrate that tetraspanins form individual nanoclusters smaller than 120 nm and quantified that a single tetraspanin CD53 cluster contains less than ten CD53 molecules. CD53 and CD37 domains were adjacent to and displayed only minor overlap with clusters containing tetraspanins CD81 or CD82. Moreover, CD53 and CD81 were found in closer proximity to their partners MHC class II and CD19 than to other tetraspanins. Although these results indicate that tetraspanin domains are adjacently positioned in the plasma membrane, they challenge the current view of the tetraspanin web of multiple tetraspanin species organized into a single domain. This study increases the molecular understanding of TEMs at the nanoscale level which is essential for comprehending tetraspanin function in cell biology.

Indexed as

Microscopy, FluorescenceAntigens, CD19B-LymphocytesCell LineCell MembraneDendritic CellsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansMembrane MicrodomainsProtein BindingTetraspanin 25Tetraspanin 28TetraspaninsAntigens, CD19Histocompatibility Antigens Class IITetraspanin 25Tetraspanin 28Tetraspanins

Identifiers

PMID26183063
PMCPMC4505338
OpenAlexW1426045486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.