ArticleEJNMMI research2015
Absorption, distribution and excretion of intravenously injected (68)Ge/ (68)Ga generator eluate in healthy rats, and estimation of human radiation dosimetry.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Engineering a modularEJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Synthesis of a Bifunctional Cross-Bridged Chelating Agent, Peptide Conjugation, and Comparison ofChemMedChem · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Non-invasive radionuclide imaging of trace metal trafficking in health and disease: "PET metallomics".RSC chemical biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Erratum to: Absorption, distribution and excretion of intravenously injected (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator eluate in healthy rats, and estimation of human radiation dosimetry.EJNMMI research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the absorption, distribution, and excretion of Gallium-68 ((68)Ga) radionuclide after a single intravenous (i.v.) injection of (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator eluate in healthy rats. Additionally, human radiation doses were estimated from the rat data.
methodsTwenty-one female and 21 male Sprague-Dawley rats were i.v. injected with 47 ± 4 MBq of (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator eluate, and the radioactivity of excised organs was measured using a gamma counter at 5, 30, 60, 120, or 180 min afterwards (n = 3-7 for each time point). The radioactivity concentration and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Subsequently, the estimates for human radiation dosimetry were determined. Additionally, 4 female and 5 male rats were positron emission tomography (PET) imaged for in vivo visualization of biodistribution.
results(68)Ga radioactivity was cleared relatively slowly from blood circulation and excreted into the urine, with some retention in the liver and spleen. Notably, the (68)Ga radioactivity in female genital organs, i.e., the uterus and ovaries, was considerable higher compared with male genitals. Extrapolating from the female and male rat (68)Ga data, the estimated effective dose was 0.0308 mSv/MBq for a 57-kg woman and 0.0191 mSv/MBq for a 70-kg man.
conclusionsThe estimated human radiation burden of the (68)Ge/(68)Ga generator eluate was slightly higher for females and similar for males as compared with somatostatin receptor ligands (68)Ga-DOTANOC, (68)Ga-DOTATOC, and (68)Ga-DOTATATE, which is probably due to the retention in the liver and spleen. Our results revealed some differences between female and male rat data, which, at least in part, may be explained by the small sample size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.