Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26182983›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2015

Motivations for food prohibitions during pregnancy and their enforcement mechanisms in a rural Ghanaian district.

Samson K Arzoaquoi, Edward E Essuman, Fred Y Gbagbo, Eric Y Tenkorang, Ireneous Soyiri, Amos K Laar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring cultural influences in perinatal and early childhood nutrition.Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samson K ArzoaquoiDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, Box LG 13, Legon, Accra, Ghana. skarzoaquoi@yahoo.com.
Edward E EssumanDepartment of Biological Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Box LG 13, Legon, Accra, Ghana. eddenco@yahoo.com.
Fred Y GbagboMarie Stopes International, Accra, Ghana. gbagbofredyao2002@yahoo.co.uk.
Eric Y TenkorangDepartment of Sociology, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada. eytenkorang@mun.ca.
Ireneous SoyiriSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences MONASH University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia. soyiriin@yahoo.com.
Amos K LaarDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, Box LG 13, Legon, Accra, Ghana. alaar@ug.edu.gh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood taboos are known from virtually all human societies and pregnant women have often been targeted. We qualitatively assessed food taboos during pregnancy, its motivating factors, and enforcement mechanisms in the Upper Manya Krobo district of Ghana.

methodsThis was an exploratory cross sectional study using qualitative focus group discussions (FGDs). Sixteen FGDs were conducted. Participants were purposively selected using the maximum variation sampling technique. Tape recorded FGDs were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Malterudian systematic text condensation technique.

resultsAll the participants were aware of the existence of food prohibitions and beliefs targeting pregnant women in Upper Manya Krobo. The study identified snails, rats, hot foods, and animal lungs as tabooed during pregnancy. Adherence motivators included expectation of safe and timely delivery, avoidance of "monkey babies" (deformed babies); respect for ancestors, parents, and community elders. Enforcement mechanisms identified included constant reminders by parents, family members and significant others. Stigmatization and community sanctions are deployed sparingly.

conclusionsFood taboos and traditional beliefs targeting pregnant women exist in Upper Manya Krobo. Pregnant women are forbidden from eating snails, rats, snakes, hot foods and animal lungs. To a large extent, socio-cultural, and to a lesser, health concerns motivate the practice.

Indexed as

DietHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesCultureEnergy IntakeFemaleFocus GroupsFoodGhanaHumansMaleMaternal Health

Identifiers

PMID26182983
PMCPMC4504131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.