Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26182944›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2015

Comparing Methods for Identifying Biologically Implausible Values in Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index Among Youth.

Hannah G Lawman, Cynthia L Ogden, Sandra Hassink, Giridhar Mallya, Stephanie Vander Veur, Gary D Foster

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Extreme Obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/mObesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah G Lawman
Cynthia L Ogden
Sandra Hassink
Giridhar Mallya
Stephanie Vander Veur
Gary D Foster

Funding

Stable Isotope and Metabolomics CoreP60DK020541 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PESSIN, JEFFREY E. · 1986 to 2014
$29.8M
Category A: Communities Putting Prevention to WorkU58DP002626 · DP · PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MALLYA, GIRIDHAR · 2010 to 2010
$16.8M
A randomized controlled trial to decrease sedentary behavior in low-income youthF32DK100248 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LAWMAN, HANNAH GRAY · 2013 to 2013
$46k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 3U58DP002626-01S1NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002626NIDDK NIH HHS 1-F32-DK100248-01NIDDK NIH HHS 1-P60-DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK100248NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more epidemiologic data on childhood obesity become available, researchers are faced with decisions regarding how to determine biologically implausible values (BIVs) in height, weight, and body mass index. The purpose of the current study was 1) to track how often large, epidemiologic studies address BIVs, 2) to review BIV identification methods, and 3) to apply those methods to a large data set of youth to determine the effects on obesity and BIV prevalence estimates. Studies with large samples of anthropometric data (n > 1,000) were reviewed to track whether and how BIVs were defined. Identified methods were then applied to a longitudinal sample of 13,662 students (65% African American, 52% male) in 55 urban, low-income schools that enroll students from kindergarten through eighth grade (ages 5-13 years) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during 2011-2012. Using measured weight and height at baseline and 1-year follow-up, we compared descriptive statistics, weight status prevalence, and BIV prevalence estimates. Eleven different BIV methods were identified. When these methods were applied to a large data set, severe obesity and BIV prevalence ranged from 7.2% to 8.6% and from 0.04% to 1.68%, respectively. Approximately 41% of large epidemiologic studies did not address BIV identification, and existing identification methods varied considerably. Increased standardization of the identification and treatment of BIVs may aid in the comparability of study results and accurate monitoring of obesity trends.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdolescentAnthropometryBiasBlack or African AmericanBody HeightBody WeightChildData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleObesity, MorbidPediatric ObesityPhiladelphiabiologically implausible valuesbody mass indexobesityyouth

Identifiers

PMID26182944
PMCPMC4528955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.