ArticleNMR in biomedicine2015
A statistical clustering approach to discriminating perfusion from conduit vessel signal contributions in a pulmonary ASL MR image.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Imaging Metrics for the Assessment of Pulmonary Pathophysiology: An Official American Thoracic Society and Fleischner Society Joint Workshop Report.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Heavy upright exercise increases ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the basal lung: indirect evidence for interstitial pulmonary edema.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019Article
- Optimizing human pulmonary perfusion measurement using an in silico model of arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- Measurement of the distribution of ventilation-perfusion ratios in the human lung with proton MRI: comparison with the multiple inert-gas elimination technique.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017Article
- Physiology for the pulmonary functional imager.European journal of radiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The measurement of pulmonary perfusion (blood delivered to the capillary bed within a voxel) using arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging is often complicated by signal artifacts from conduit vessels that carry blood destined for voxels at a distant location in the lung. One approach to dealing with conduit vessel contributions involves the application of an absolute threshold on the ASL signal. While useful for identifying a subset of the most dominant high signal conduit image features, signal thresholding cannot discriminate between perfusion and conduit vessel contributions at intermediate and low signal. As an alternative, this article discusses a data-driven statistical approach based on statistical clustering for characterizing and discriminating between capillary perfusion and conduit vessel contributions over the full signal spectrum. An ASL flow image is constructed from the difference between a pair of tagged magnetic resonance images. However, when viewed as a bivariate projection that treats the image pair as independent measures (rather than the univariate quantity that results from the subtraction of the two images), the signal associated with capillary perfusion contributions is observed to cluster independently of the signal associated with conduit vessel contributions. Analyzing the observed clusters using a Gaussian mixture model makes it possible to discriminate between conduit vessel and capillary-perfusion-dominated signal contributions over the full signal spectrum of the ASL image. As a demonstration of feasibility, this study compares the proposed clustering approach with the standard absolute signal threshold strategy in a small number of test images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.