ArticlePloS one2015
Genome-Wide Association Study on Male Genital Shape and Size in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic basis and repeatability for desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae).Genetica · 2024Article
- A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Long-term evolution of quantitative traits in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.Genetica · 2022Article
- Genomic and gene expression associations to morphology of a sexual ornament in the chicken.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Assessing the patterns and drivers of shape complexity in the amblypygid pedipalp.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021Article
- Unraveling the Genetic Basis for the Rapid Diversification of Male Genitalia between Drosophila Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- An Atlas of Transcription Factors Expressed in Male Pupal Terminalia ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.Science advances · 2019Article
- The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018Article
- Correction: Genome-Wide Association Study on Male Genital Shape and Size in Drosophila melanogaster.PloS one · 2018Article
- Charting the genotype-phenotype map: lessons from the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018Review
- Drosophila and genome-wide association studies: a review and resource for the functional dissection of human complex traits.Disease models & mechanisms · 2017Review
- The Genetic Basis of Baculum Size and Shape Variation in Mice.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Mapping QTL Contributing to Variation in Posterior Lobe Morphology between Strains of Drosophila melanogaster.PloS one · 2016Article
- A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male genital morphology of animals with internal fertilization and promiscuous mating systems have been one of the most diverse and rapidly evolving morphological traits. The male genital morphology in general is known to have low phenotypic and genetic variations, but the genetic basis of the male genital variation remains unclear. Drosophila melanogaster and its closely related species are morphologically very similar, but the shapes of the posterior lobe, a cuticular projection on the male genital arch are distinct from each other, representing a model system for studying the genetic basis of male genital morphology. In this study, we used highly inbred whole genome sequenced strains of D. melanogaster to perform genome wide association analysis on posterior lobe morphology. We quantified the outline shape of posterior lobes with Fourier coefficients obtained from elliptic Fourier analysis and performed principal component analysis, and posterior lobe size. The first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained approximately 88% of the total variation of the posterior lobe shape. We then examined the association between the principal component scores and posterior lobe size and 1902142 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). As a result, we obtained 15, 14 and 15 SNPs for PC1, PC2 and posterior lobe size with P-values smaller than 10(-5). Based on the location of the SNPs, 13, 13 and six protein coding genes were identified as potential candidates for PC1, PC2 and posterior lobe size, respectively. In addition to the previous findings showing that the intraspecific posterior shape variation are regulated by multiple QTL with strong effects, the present study suggests that the intraspecific variation may be under polygenic regulation with a number of loci with small effects. Further studies are required for investigating whether these candidate genes are responsible for the intraspecific posterior lobe shape variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.