Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26181675›Full record

ReviewGames for health journal2015

Cultivating Engagement and Enjoyment in Exergames Using Feedback, Challenge, and Rewards.

Elizabeth J Lyons

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Games for health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elizabeth J LyonsInstitute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, Texas.

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000071 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2012 to 2014
$14.4M
UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
LEVEL UP: Video games for activity in breast cancer survivorsK07CA175141 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI LYONS, ELIZABETH J. · 2014 to 2014
$124k
AHRQ HHS R24HS22134NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000071NCI NIH HHS K07CA175141NIA NIH HHS P30AG024832NICHD NIH HHS K12HD052023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article reviews theoretical and empirical evidence related to three mechanisms for encouraging enjoyment during exergame play: Feedback, challenge, and rewards. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search and narrative review were conducted.

resultsFeedback is found in nearly all exergames, and richer, more in-depth feedback is associated with increased activity. Challenge is a vital component of any videogame, and exergames include physical as well as cognitive challenges. Flow states have traditionally been conceptualized as occurring when an optimal match between player skills and game challenge occurs. However, failure and retrial are necessary for feelings of overall satisfaction and fun, despite not necessarily being ideally fun or satisfying themselves. Rewards are a more complicated issue, with significant theoretical and empirical evidence suggesting positive and negative effects of reward systems. How rewards are integrated into the mechanics and storyline of the game likely impacts how they are perceived and, thus, their effectiveness. Finally, integration of these mechanisms into exergames requires specific attention to both cognitive and physical implementations. Movements that are not themselves enjoyable or engaging may lead to cheating and lower energy expenditure.

conclusionsFeedback, challenge, and rewards are promising mechanisms by which exergames could become more enjoyable. How these concepts are operationalized can affect physical and psychological reactions to exergames. Attention to these concepts in future exergame development and implementation would benefit theory, research, and practice.

Indexed as

FeedbackReinforcement, PsychologySoftware DesignExerciseHealth BehaviorHumansMovementNarrationPersonal SatisfactionPhysical FitnessPsychological TheoryUser-Computer InterfaceVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID26181675
PMCPMC4580142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.