Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26181436›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Ecological Specialization of Two Photobiont-Specific Maritime Cyanolichen Species of the Genus Lichina.

Rüdiger Ortiz-Álvarez, Asunción de Los Ríos, Fernando Fernández-Mendoza, Antonio Torralba-Burrial, Sergio Pérez-Ortega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The macroevolutionary dynamics of symbiotic and phenotypic diversification in lichens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rüdiger Ortiz-ÁlvarezIntegrative Freshwater Ecology Group, Center of Advanced Studies of Blanes, Spanish Council for Research (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Girona, Spain.
Asunción de Los RíosDepartment of Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Fernández-MendozaInstitute of Botany, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, A-8010, Graz, Austria.
Antonio Torralba-BurrialBiosfera Consultoría Medioambiental, Candamo, 5 Bajos, 33012, Oviedo, Spain.
Sergio Pérez-OrtegaDepartment of Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All fungi in the class Lichinomycetes are lichen-forming and exclusively associate with cyanobacteria. Two closely related maritime species of the genus Lichina (L. confinis and L. pygmaea) show similar distribution ranges in the Northeast Atlantic, commonly co-occurring at the same rocky shores but occupying different littoral zones. By means of 16S rRNA and phycocyanin operon markers we studied a) the phylogenetic relationships of cyanobionts associated with these species, b) the match of divergence times between both symbionts, and c) whether Lichina species differ in photobiont association and in how geography and ecology affect selectivity. The cyanobionts studied are closely related to both marine and freshwater strains of the genus Rivularia. We found evidence of a high specificity to particular cyanobiont lineages in both species: Lichina pygmaea and L. confinis incorporate specific lineages of Rivularia that do not overlap at the haplotype nor the OTU levels. Dating divergences of the fungal and cyanobacterial partners revealed an asynchronous origin of both lineages. Within each fungal species, selectivity varied across the studied area, influenced by environmental conditions (both atmospheric and marine), although patterns were highly correlated between both lichen taxa. Ecological speciation due to the differential association of photobionts to each littoral zone is suspected to have occurred in marine Lichina.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAscomycotaBase SequenceBayes TheoremCyanobacteriaEcosystemFresh WaterGenetic SpeciationHaplotypesLichensMolecular Sequence DataOperonPhycocyaninRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterSpainPhycocyaninRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26181436
PMCPMC4504470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.