Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26181260›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2015

Statin Use at the Time of Initiation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Time to Progression in Patients With Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Lauren C Harshman, Xiaodong Wang, Mari Nakabayashi, Wanling Xie, Loana Valenca, Lillian Werner, Yongjiang Yu, Aaron M Kantoff, Christopher J Sweeney, Lorelei A Mucci and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 83 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Association of Tissue Abiraterone Levels andClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Adenosine AFEBS open bio · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren C HarshmanLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Xiaodong WangGelb Center for Translational Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mari NakabayashiLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wanling XieDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Loana ValencaLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lillian WernerDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yongjiang YuGelb Center for Translational Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts4Department of Urology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Aaron M KantoffApple Tree Partners, New York, New York.
Christopher J SweeneyLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lorelei A MucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark PomerantzLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gwo-Shu Mary LeeGelb Center for Translational Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Philip W KantoffLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Gelb Center for Translational Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USApple (United States) · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Tumor and Circulating Markers as Links Between Obesity and Lethal Prostate CanceP50CA090381 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI LODA, MASSIMO · 2002 to 2017
$36.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381WETP NIH HHS WT091730MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceStatin use has been associated with improved prostate cancer outcomes. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is a precursor of testosterone and a substrate for SLCO2B1, an organic anionic transporter. We previously demonstrated that genetic variants of SLCO2B1 correlated with time to progression (TTP) during receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Statins also use SLCO2B1 to enter cells, and thus we hypothesized that they may compete with DHEAS uptake by the tumor cells.

objectiveTo evaluate whether statin use prolongs TTP during ADT for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn vitro studies were performed using prostate cancer cell lines at an academic, comprehensive cancer center. Statin use was retrospectively analyzed in 926 patients who had received ADT for biochemical or metastatic recurrence or de novo metastatic prostate cancer between January 1996 and November 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: To determine whether statins interfere with DHEAS uptake, we performed in vitro studies using prostate cancer cell lines. Next, we queried our institutional clinical database to assess for an association between statin use and TTP during ADT using multivariable Cox regression analysis and adjusted for known prognostic factors.

resultsIn vitro, we demonstrated that statins block DHEAS uptake by competitively binding to SLCO2B1. In our ADT cohort of 926 patients, 283 (31%) were taking a statin at ADT initiation. After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 644 patients (70%) had experienced disease progression while receiving ADT. Median TTP during ADT was 20.3 months (95% CI, 18-24 months). Men taking statins had a longer median TTP during ADT compared with nonusers (27.5 [95% CI, 21.1-37.7] vs 17.4 [95% CI, 14.9-21.1] months; P < .001). The association remained statistically significant after adjusting for predefined prognostic factors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69-0.99]; P = .04). The positive statin effect was observed for both patients with and without metastases (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.58-1.07] for M0 disease and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.67-1.06] for M1 disease; P for interaction = .72). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Statin use at the time of ADT initiation was associated with a significantly longer TTP during ADT even after adjustment for known prognostic factors. Our in vitro finding that statins competitively reduce DHEAS uptake, thus effectively decreasing the available intratumoral androgen pool, affords a plausible mechanism to support the clinical observation of prolonged TTP in statin users.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBinding, CompetitiveCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChi-Square DistributionDehydroepiandrosterone SulfateDisease ProgressionHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentOrganic Anion TransportersProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalDehydroepiandrosterone SulfateHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOrganic Anion TransportersSLCO2B1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26181260
PMCPMC5554437
OpenAlexW2124033164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.