Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26181029›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2015

Genomic Correlate of Exceptional Erlotinib Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Eliezer M Van Allen, Vivian W Y Lui, Ann Marie Egloff, Eva M Goetz, Hua Li, Jonas T Johnson, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Julie E Bauman, Nicolas Stransky, Yan Zeng and 17 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Phase I/II Study of Evofosfamide, A Hypoxia-activated Prodrug with or without Bortezomib in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NSAIDs OvercomeCancers · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Erlotinib sensitivity ofNPJ genomic medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliezer M Van AllenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Vivian W Y LuiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li-Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong4Department of Biochemistry, Li-Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong5Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsb.
Ann Marie EgloffDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania6Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Eva M GoetzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hua LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jonas T JohnsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Umamaheswar DuvvuriDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Julie E BaumanDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nicolas StranskyBlueprint Medicines, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Yan ZengDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Breean R GilbertDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kelsey P PendletonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lin WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Simion ChioseaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carrie SougnezCancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Nikhil WagleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Yu DuDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David CloseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paul A JohnstonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Aaron McKennaDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Scott L CarterCancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Todd R GolubDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Gad GetzCancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge13Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Levi A GarrawayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge.
Jennifer R GrandisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania14Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USBroad Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBlueprint Medicines (United States) · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USHKU-Pasteur Research Pole · HKUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Greg M. Delgoffe · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
GRPR Signaling in SCCHN: Integration with EGFRR01CA098372 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2004 to 2017
$3.8M
Genomic and Proteomic Biomarkers for Head and Neck Cancer Risk and PrognosisK07CA137140 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI EGLOFF, ANN MARIE · 2009 to 2013
$519k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA137140NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098372NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceRandomized clinical trials demonstrate no benefit for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in unselected patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, a patient with stage IVA HNSCC received 13 days of neoadjuvant erlotinib and experienced a near-complete histologic response.

objectiveTo determine a mechanism of exceptional response to erlotinib therapy in HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsSingle patient with locally advanced HNSCC who received erlotinib monotherapy in a window-of-opportunity clinical trial (patients scheduled to undergo primary cancer surgery are treated briefly with an investigational agent). Whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor and germline patient samples was performed at a quaternary care academic medical center, and a candidate somatic variant was experimentally investigated for mediating erlotinib response.

interventionA brief course of erlotinib monotherapy followed by surgical resection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Identification of pretreatment tumor somatic alterations that may contribute to the exceptional response to erlotinib. Hypotheses were formulated regarding enhanced erlotinib response in preclinical models harboring the patient tumor somatic variant MAPK1 E322K following the identification of tumor somatic variants.

resultsNo EGFR alterations were observed in the pretreatment tumor DNA. Paradoxically, the tumor harbored an activating MAPK1 E322K mutation (allelic fraction 0.13), which predicts ERK activation and erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. The HNSCC cells with MAPK1 E322K exhibited enhanced EGFR phosphorylation and erlotinib sensitivity compared with wild-type MAPK1 cells. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Selective erlotinib use in HNSCC may be informed by precision oncology approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Administration ScheduleErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Molecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideMAPK1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26181029
PMCPMC4557203
OpenAlexW2035779363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.