Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26180633›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2015

Resources, challenges and way forward in rare mitochondrial diseases research.

Neeraj Kumar Rajput, Vipin Singh, Anshu Bhardwaj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neeraj Kumar RajputOpen Source Drug Discovery (OSDD) Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 110001, India.
Vipin SinghAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, India.
Anshu BhardwajOpen Source Drug Discovery (OSDD) Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 110001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 300 million people are affected by about 7000 rare diseases globally. There are tremendous resource limitations and challenges in driving research and drug development for rare diseases. Hence, innovative approaches are needed to identify potential solutions. This review focuses on the resources developed over the past years for analysis of genome data towards understanding disease biology especially in the context of mitochondrial diseases, given that mitochondria are central to major cellular pathways and their dysfunction leads to a broad spectrum of diseases. Platforms for collaboration of research groups, clinicians and patients and the advantages of community collaborative efforts in addressing rare diseases are also discussed. The review also describes crowdsourcing and crowdfunding efforts in rare diseases research and how the upcoming initiatives for understanding disease biology including analyses of large number of genomes are also applicable to rare diseases.

Indexed as

crowdfundingcrowdsourcinggenome variationmitochondriamitochondrial DNAnext generation sequencingrare diseasesemantic-web

Identifiers

PMID26180633
PMCPMC4490798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.