Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26180539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2015

Wolbachia in butterflies and moths: geographic structure in infection frequency.

Muhammad Z Ahmed, Eli V Araujo-Jnr, John J Welch, Akito Y Kawahara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pervasive effects ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Gut microbiome of the grape berry moth,Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Climate predictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New microbes and new infections · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Diversity ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Limited association betweenEvolutionary applications · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Z AhmedFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 32611 Gainesville, FL USA ; Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th Street, 33031 Homestead, FL USA.
Eli V Araujo-JnrInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th Street, 33031 Homestead, FL USA.
John J WelchDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH Cambridge, UK.
Akito Y KawaharaInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th Street, 33031 Homestead, FL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionButterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) constitute one of the most diverse insect orders, and play an important role in ecosystem function. However, little is known in terms of their bacterial communities. Wolbachia, perhaps the most common and widespread intracellular bacterium on Earth, can manipulate the physiology and reproduction of its hosts, and is transmitted vertically from mother to offspring, or sometimes horizontally between species. While its role in some hosts has been studied extensively, its incidence across Lepidoptera is poorly understood. A recent analysis using a beta-binomial model to infer the between-species distribution of prevalence estimated that approximately 40 % of arthropod species are infected with Wolbachia, but particular taxonomic groups and ecological niches seem to display substantially higher or lower incidences. In this study, we took an initial step and applied a similar, maximum likelihood approach to 300 species of Lepidoptera (7604 individuals from 660 populations) belonging to 17 families and 10 superfamilies, and sampled from 36 countries, representing all continents excluding Antarctica.

resultsApproximately a quarter to a third of individuals appear to be infected with Wolbachia, and around 80 % of Lepidoptera species are infected at a non-negligible frequency. This incidence estimate is very high compared to arthropods in general. Wolbachia infection in Lepidoptera is shown to vary between families, but there is no evidence for closely related groups to show similar infection levels. True butterflies (Papilionoidea) are overrepresented in our data, however, our estimates show this group can be taken as a representative for the other major lepidopteran superfamilies. We also show substantial variation in infection level according to geography - closer locations tend to show similar infection levels. We further show that variation in geography is due to a latitudinal gradient in Wolbachia infection, with lower frequencies towards higher latitudes.

conclusionsOur comprehensive survey of Wolbachia infection in Lepidoptera suggests that infection incidence is very high, and provides evidence that climate and geography are strong predictors of infection frequency.

Indexed as

BacteriaButterflyLatitudinal gradientMoth

Identifiers

PMID26180539
PMCPMC4502936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.