ArticleImmunity & ageing : I & A2015
Effects of ebselen and N-acetyl cysteine on replicative aging of primary human fibroblast strains.
Article in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex vivo Anti-Senescence Activity of N-Acetylcysteine in Visceral Adipose Tissue of Obese Volunteers.Obesity facts · 2024Article
- The Na/K-ATPase Oxidant Amplification Loop Regulates Aging.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Administration of selected concentrations of ebselen and N-acetyl cysteine have been proven to display an antioxidant potential based on their effect on markers of T cell integrity and function in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD4(+) T cell clones. Here we assessed the impact of various antioxidant concentrations on replicative aging of primary human fibroblast strains derived from embryonic lung (MRC-5) and foreskin (HFF). None of the antioxidant concentrations affected the cumulative population doublings, levels of oxidative DNA damage, intracellular GSH:GSSG ratio, potency of heat shock responses and the induction of senescence in both fibroblast strains. Our results showed no effect of both antioxidants on primary fibroblast strains and reveal their cell type specific antioxidant potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.