Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26180506›Full record

ArticleVisual cognition2015

Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction.

Francesco Marini, Berry van den Berg, Marty G Woldorff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual cognition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analytic investigation of the role of reward on inhibitory control.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Expectations don't protect us from emotional distractions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco MariniCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, NC, USA ; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.
Berry van den BergCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, NC, USA ; Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marty G WoldorffCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, NC, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Studies of Attention Using Combined ERPs and fMRIR01MH060415 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2001 to 2013
$3.6M
Attentional Mechanisms in Multisensory EnvironmentsR01NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2006 to 2016
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060415NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When attending for impending visual stimuli, cognitive systems prepare to identify relevant information while ignoring irrelevant, potentially distracting input. Recent work (Marini et al., 2013) showed that a supramodal distracter-filtering mechanism is invoked in blocked designs involving expectation of possible distracter stimuli, although this entails a cost (

Indexed as

attentional preparationcued distracter-expectation costcueing paradigmdistraction-filtering costflanker taskreward prospect

Identifiers

PMID26180506
PMCPMC4500291
OpenAlexW2084348066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.