Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26180354›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2015

Weaning from mechanical ventilation: a cross-sectional study of reference values and the discriminative validity of aging.

Camilo Corbellini, Cristiane Brenner Eilert Trevisan, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Alexandre Doval da Costa, Silvia Regina Rios Vieira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Aging Effects on Alveolar Sacs Under Mechanical Ventilation.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilo CorbelliniPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil ; Casa di Cura Villa Serena, Italy.
Cristiane Brenner Eilert TrevisanPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jorge Hugo VillafañeIRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Italy.
Alexandre Doval da CostaPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Silvia Regina Rios VieiraHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To evaluate pre-extubation variables and check the discriminative validity of age as well as its correlation with weaning failure in elderly patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients (48% female) who were on mechanical ventilation and had undergone orotracheal intubation were divided into four subgroups according to their age: <59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and >80 years old. The expiratory volume (VE), respiratory frequency (f), tidal volume (VT), and respiratory frequency/tidal volume ratio (f/VT) were used to examine differences in weaning parameters between the four subgroups, and age was correlated with weaning failure. [Results] The rate of weaning failure was 27.8% in patients aged >80 years and 22.1% in patients aged <60 years old. Elderly patients presented higher f/VT and f values and lower VT values. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for f/VT ratio were smaller than those published previously. [Conclusion] Our results indicate that aging influences weaning criteria without causing an increase in weaning failure.

Indexed as

AgingMechanical ventilationWeaning

Identifiers

PMID26180354
PMCPMC4500017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.