ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2015
Correlations among pelvic positions and differences in lower extremity joint angles during walking in female university students.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinematic Analysis of Pelvic and Lower Limb Joints during Stand-to-sit Movement in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: A cross-sectional study.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
- Effects of pelvic adjustment on pelvic posture and angles of the lower limb joints during walking in female university students.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to identify correlations among pelvic positions and differences in lower extremity joint angles during walking in female university students. [Subjects] Thirty female university students were enrolled and their pelvic positions and differences in lower extremity joint angles were measured. [Methods] Pelvic position, pelvic torsion, and pelvic rotation were assessed using the BackMapper. In addition, motion analysis was performed to derive differences between left and right flexion, abduction, and external rotation ranges of hip joints; flexion, abduction, and external rotation ranges of knee joints; and dorsiflexion, inversion, and abduction ranges of ankle joints, according to X, Y, and Z-axes. [Results] Pelvic position was found to be positively correlated with differences between left and right hip flexion (r=0.51), hip abduction (r=0.62), knee flexion (r=0.45), knee abduction (r=0.42), and ankle inversion (r=0.38). In addition, the difference between left and right hip abduction showed a positive correlation with difference between left and right ankle dorsiflexion (r=0.64). Moreover, differences between left and right knee flexion exhibited positive correlations with differences between left and right knee abduction (r=0.41) and ankle inversion (r=0.45). [Conclusion] Bilateral pelvic tilt angles are important as they lead to bilateral differences in lower extremity joint angles during walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.