Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26180079›Full record

ReviewCancer research2015

Maintaining Tumor Heterogeneity in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts.

John W Cassidy, Carlos Caldas, Alejandra Bruna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Establishment and characterization of a testicular yolk sac tumor PDX model.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preclinical Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Immunogenicity of Gene and Cell Therapies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Murine Models of Obesity-Related Cancer Risk.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John W CassidyBreast Cancer Functional Genomics, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka-Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carlos CaldasBreast Cancer Functional Genomics, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka-Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alejandra BrunaBreast Cancer Functional Genomics, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka-Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. alejandra.bruna@cruk.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16942Cancer Research UK A16942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical models often fail to capture the diverse heterogeneity of human malignancies and as such lack clinical predictive power. Patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) have emerged as a powerful technology: capable of retaining the molecular heterogeneity of their originating sample. However, heterogeneity within a tumor is governed by both cell-autonomous (e.g., genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity) and non-cell-autonomous (e.g., stromal heterogeneity) drivers. Although PDXs can largely recapitulate the polygenomic architecture of human tumors, they do not fully account for heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment. Hence, these models have substantial utility in basic and translational research in cancer biology; however, study of stromal or immune drivers of malignant progression may be limited. Similarly, PDX models offer the ability to conduct patient-specific in vivo and ex vivo drug screens, but stromal contributions to treatment responses may be under-represented. This review discusses the sources and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity and how these are recapitulated in the PDX model. Limitations of the current generation of PDXs are discussed and strategies to improve several aspects of the model with respect to preserving heterogeneity are proposed.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsHumansMiceNeoplasms, Experimental

Identifiers

PMID26180079
PMCPMC4539570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.