ArticleHealthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2015
Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.
Article in Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system.Contemporary clinical trials · 2016Trial
- Meaningful engagement of lived experience in diabetes research and health service improvement: A rapid review of barriers to and enablers for community involvement among adults with type 2 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- A Qualitative Exploration of the Practice Learning Experiences of Third-Year Nursing Students: Challenges and Opportunities.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement in a type 2 diabetes comparative effectiveness study utilizing real-world data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Revisiting the hospital-issued gown in hospitalizations from a locus of control and patient-centered care perspectives: a call for design thinking.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Designing an online intervention for adults with addictive eating: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Changing the research paradigm for digital transformation in healthcare delivery.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022Article
- How mHealth can facilitate collaboration in diabetes care: qualitative analysis of co-design workshops.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Review
- Patient centered research to improve community involvement (PaRTICIpate) in diabetes self-management: a conference series for developing collaborations between researchers, stakeholders, and patients.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2018Article
- Article
- A Patient and Provider Research Agenda on Diabetes and Hypertension Management.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Population Health Management for Diabetes: Health Care System-Level Approaches for Improving Quality and Addressing Disparities.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Maintaining primacy of the patient perspective in the development of patient-centered patient reported outcomes.PloS one · 2017Article
- An Innovative Approach to Informing Research: Gathering Perspectives on Diabetes Care Challenges From an Online Patient Community.Interactive journal of medical research · 2015Article
- Creating patient-centered health care systems to improve outcomes and reduce disparities.Israel journal of health policy research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engaging stakeholders in the research process has the potential to improve quality of care and the patient care experience. Online patient community surveys can elicit important topic areas for comparative effectiveness research. Stakeholder meetings with substantial patient representation, as well as representation from health care delivery systems and research funding agencies, are a valuable tool for selecting and refining pilot research and quality improvement projects. Giving patient stakeholders a deciding vote in selecting pilot research topics helps ensure their 'voice' is heard. Researchers and health care leaders should continue to develop best-practices and strategies for increasing patient involvement in comparative effectiveness and delivery science research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.