Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26179309›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Diagnostic Performance of the New Version (v2.0) of GenoType MTBDRsl Assay for Detection of Resistance to Fluoroquinolones and Second-Line Injectable Drugs: a Multicenter Study.

Elisa Tagliani, Andrea M Cabibbe, Paolo Miotto, Emanuele Borroni, Juan Carlos Toro, Mikael Mansjö, Sven Hoffner, Doris Hillemann, Aksana Zalutskaya, Alena Skrahina and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Culture-Free Whole Genome Sequencing ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Transcriptomic responses to antibiotic exposure inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Correlation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Effectiveness of GenoType MTBDRThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Elisa TaglianiEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Andrea M CabibbeEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paolo MiottoEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele BorroniEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Juan Carlos ToroUnit for Highly Pathogenic Bacteria, Department of Microbiology, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Mikael MansjöUnit for Highly Pathogenic Bacteria, Department of Microbiology, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Sven HoffnerUnit for Highly Pathogenic Bacteria, Department of Microbiology, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Doris HillemannDiagnostic Mycobacteriology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany.
Aksana ZalutskayaRepublican Research and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.
Alena SkrahinaRepublican Research and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.
Daniela M CirilloEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy cirillo.daniela@hsr.it.
Public Health Agency of Sweden · SEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleRepublican Scientific and Practical Centre of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis · BYResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DEVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to fluoroquinolones (FLQ) and second-line injectable drugs (SLID) is steadily increasing, especially in eastern European countries, posing a serious threat to effective tuberculosis (TB) infection control and adequate patient management. The availability of rapid molecular tests for the detection of extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) is critical in areas with high rates of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and XDR-TB and limited conventional drug susceptibility testing (DST) capacity. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the performance of the new version (v2.0) of the Genotype MTBDRsl assay compared to phenotypic DST and sequencing on a panel of 228 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and 231 smear-positive clinical specimens. The inclusion of probes for the detection of mutations in the eis promoter region in the MTBDRsl v2.0 test resulted in a higher sensitivity for detection of kanamycin resistance for both direct and indirect testing (96% and 95.4%, respectively) than that seen with the original version of the assay, whereas the test sensitivities for detection of FLQ resistance remained unchanged (93% and 83.6% for direct and indirect testing, respectively). Moreover, MTBDRsl v2.0 showed better performance characteristics than v1.0 for the detection of XDR-TB, with high specificity and sensitivities of 81.8% and 80.4% for direct and indirect testing, respectively. MTBDRsl v2.0 thus represents a reliable test for the rapid detection of resistance to second-line drugs and a useful screening tool to guide the initiation of appropriate MDR-TB treatment.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialGenotypeAntitubercular AgentsFluoroquinolonesGenotyping TechniquesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificityAntitubercular AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID26179309
PMCPMC4540937
OpenAlexW1610203956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.