Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26179232›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2015

Prediction error and trace dominance determine the fate of fear memories after post-training manipulations.

Joaquín M Alfei, Roque I Ferrer Monti, Victor A Molina, Adrián M Bueno, Gonzalo P Urcelay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Apparent reconsolidation interference without generalized amnesia.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Generalization and recovery of post-retrieval amnesia.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. EZH2 Methyltransferase Activity Controls Pten Expression and mTOR Signaling during Fear Memory Reconsolidation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. A Novel Retrieval-Dependent Memory Process Revealed by the Arrest of ERK1/2 Activation in the Basolateral Amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joaquín M AlfeiLaboratorio de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología.
Roque I Ferrer MontiLaboratorio de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología.
Victor A MolinaDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, 5000, Argentina.
Adrián M BuenoLaboratorio de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología.
Gonzalo P UrcelayDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom gonurcelay@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different mnemonic outcomes have been observed when associative memories are reactivated by CS exposure and followed by amnestics. These outcomes include mere retrieval, destabilization-reconsolidation, a transitional period (which is insensitive to amnestics), and extinction learning. However, little is known about the interaction between initial learning conditions and these outcomes during a reinforced or nonreinforced reactivation. Here we systematically combined temporally specific memories with different reactivation parameters to observe whether these four outcomes are determined by the conditions established during training. First, we validated two training regimens with different temporal expectations about US arrival. Then, using Midazolam (MDZ) as an amnestic agent, fear memories in both learning conditions were submitted to retraining either under identical or different parameters to the original training. Destabilization (i.e., susceptibly to MDZ) occurred when reactivation was reinforced, provided the occurrence of a temporal prediction error about US arrival. In subsequent experiments, both treatments were systematically reactivated by nonreinforced context exposure of different lengths, which allowed to explore the interaction between training and reactivation lengths. These results suggest that temporal prediction error and trace dominance determine the extent to which reactivation produces the different outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, PsychologicalElectroshockFearFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMemoryMidazolamNeuropsychological TestsPsychotropic DrugsRandom AllocationRats, WistarReinforcement, PsychologyTime FactorsMidazolamPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26179232
PMCPMC4509917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.