Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26179223›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2015

Pain Duration and Resolution following Surgery: An Inception Cohort Study.

Ian R Carroll, Jennifer M Hah, Peter L Barelka, Charlie K M Wang, Bing M Wang, Matthew J Gillespie, Rebecca McCue, Jarred W Younger, Jodie Trafton, Keith Humphreys and 3 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery Without Complications.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ian R CarrollDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jennifer M HahDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Peter L BarelkaDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Charlie K M WangStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab (SNAPL), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Bing M WangStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab (SNAPL), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Matthew J GillespieStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab (SNAPL), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Rebecca McCueStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab (SNAPL), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jarred W YoungerDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jodie TraftonDepartments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Veterans Affairs and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Keith HumphreysDepartments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Veterans Affairs and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Stuart B GoodmanOrthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Fredrick M DirbasSurgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sean C MackeyDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Translational Pain ResearchK24DA029262 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
Psychological Factors Contributing to Persistent Opioid Use After SurgeryK23DA035302 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAH, JENNIFER · 2013 to 2017
$903k
Prescription Opioid Use, Misuse and Pain in Post-Surgical PatientsK23DA025152 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, IAN RICHARD · 2008 to 2012
$896k
NIDA NIH HHS 1K23DA025152NIDA NIH HHS 1K23DA035302NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA025152NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA035302NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePreoperative determinants of pain duration following surgery are poorly understood. We identified preoperative predictors of prolonged pain after surgery in a mixed surgical cohort.

methodsWe conducted a prospective longitudinal study of patients undergoing mastectomy, lumpectomy, thoracotomy, total knee replacement, or total hip replacement. We measured preoperative psychological distress and substance use, and then measured pain and opioid use after surgery until patients reported the cessation of both opioid consumption and pain. The primary endpoint was time to opioid cessation, and those results have been previously reported. Here, we report preoperative determinants of time to pain resolution following surgery in Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsBetween January 2007 and April 2009, we enrolled 107 of 134 consecutively approached patients undergoing the aforementioned surgical procedures. In the final multivariate model, preoperative self-perceived risk of addiction predicted more prolonged pain. Unexpectedly, anxiety sensitivity predicted more rapid pain resolution after surgery. Each one-point increase (on a four point scale) of self-perceived risk of addiction was associated with a 38% (95% CI 3-61) reduction in the rate of pain resolution (P = 0.04). Furthermore, higher anxiety sensitivity was associated with an 89% (95% CI 23-190) increased rate of pain resolution (P = 0.004).

conclusionsGreater preoperative self-perceived risk of addiction, and lower anxiety sensitivity predicted a slower rate of pain resolution following surgery. Each of these factors was a better predictor of pain duration than preoperative depressive symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, past substance use, fear of pain, gender, age, preoperative pain, or preoperative opioid use.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsAnalgesics, OpioidCaliforniaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainPrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidAcute PainAddictionPostoperative Pain

Identifiers

PMID26179223
PMCPMC4706803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.