Trial reportJournal of virology2015
Reactivation Kinetics of HIV-1 and Susceptibility of Reactivated Latently Infected CD4+ T Cells to HIV-1-Specific CD8+ T Cells.
Trial report in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the immunogenicity and impact on the latent HIV-1 reservoir of a conserved region vaccine, MVA.HIVconsv, in antiretroviral therapy-treated subjects.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Trial
- World free HIV: the novel therapeutic approaches for eliminating latent HIV infection.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Changes in HIV-1 Reservoir Dynamics After Mpox Infection.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Latency Reversing Agents and the Road to an HIV CurePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- CD4+ T cell recognition of HIV-1 alternate reading frame proteins.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- HIV-1 latency reversal agent boosting is not limited by opioid use.JCI insight · 2024Article
- HIV-1 latency reversal agent boosting is not limited by opioid use.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Latency reversal agents modulate HIV antigen processing and presentation to CD8 T cells.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
- Interferon Alpha Enhances NK Cell Function and the Suppressive Capacity of HIV-Specific CD8Journal of virology · 2019Article
- Phenotype, Polyfunctionality, and Antiviral Activity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Vorinostat Renders the Replication-Competent Latent Reservoir of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Vulnerable to Clearance by CD8 T Cells.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
- The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8+ T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication.EBioMedicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe "shock and kill" model of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) eradication involves the induction of transcription of HIV-1 genes in latently infected CD4(+) T cells, followed by the elimination of these infected CD4(+) T cells by CD8(+) T cells or other effector cells. CD8(+) T cells may also be needed to control the spread of new infection if residual infected cells are present at the time combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is discontinued. In order to determine the time frame needed for CD8(+) T cells to effectively prevent the spread of HIV-1 infection, we examined the kinetics of HIV transcription and virus release in latently infected cells reactivated ex vivo. Isolated resting, primary CD4(+) T cells from HIV-positive (HIV+) subjects on suppressive regimens were found to upregulate cell-associated HIV-1 mRNA within 1 h of stimulation and produce extracellular virus as early as 6 h poststimulation. In spite of the rapid kinetics of virus production, we show that CD8(+) T cells from 2 out of 4 viremic controllers were capable of effectively eliminating reactivated autologous CD4(+) cells that upregulate cell-associated HIV-1 mRNA. The results have implications for devising strategies to prevent rebound viremia due to reactivation of rare latently infected cells that persist after potentially curative therapy. IMPORTANCE: A prominent HIV-1 cure strategy termed "shock and kill" involves the induction of HIV-1 transcription in latently infected CD4(+) T cells with the goal of elimination of these cells by either the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response or other immune cell subsets. However, the cytotoxic T cell response may also be required after curative treatment if residual latently infected cells remain. The kinetics of HIV-1 reactivation indicate rapid upregulation of cell-associated HIV-1 mRNA and a 5-h window between transcription and virus release. Thus, HIV-specific CD8(+) T cell responses likely have a very short time frame to eliminate residual latently infected CD4(+) T cells that become reactivated after discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy following potentially curative treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.