Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26178788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2016

Biological effects of fulvestrant on estrogen receptor positive human breast cancer: short, medium and long-term effects based on sequential biopsies.

Amit Agrawal, John F R Robertson, Kwok L Cheung, Eleanor Gutteridge, Ian O Ellis, Robert I Nicholson, Julia M W Gee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Marked for destruction.Nature biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Black tea andAmerican journal of translational research · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amit AgrawalDivision of Breast Surgery, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, DE22 3DT, United Kingdom.
John F R RobertsonDivision of Breast Surgery, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, DE22 3DT, United Kingdom.
Kwok L CheungDivision of Breast Surgery, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, DE22 3DT, United Kingdom.
Eleanor GutteridgeUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Ian O EllisUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Robert I NicholsonCardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, United Kingdom.
Julia M W GeeCardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBCardiff University · GBNottingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the first study of the biological effect of fulvestrant on ER positive clinical breast cancer using sequential biopsies through to progression. Thirty-two locally/systemically advanced breast cancers treated with first-line fulvestrant (250 mg/month) were biopsied at therapy initiation, 6 weeks, 6 months and progression and immunohistochemically-analyzed for Ki67, ER, EGFR and HER2 expression/signaling activity. This series showed good fulvestrant responses (duration of response [DoR] = 25.8 months; clinical benefit = 81%). Ki67 fell (p < 0.001) in 79% of tumours by 6 months and lower Ki67 at all preprogression time-points predicted for longer DoR. ER and PR significantly decreased in all tumours by 6 months (p < 0.001), with some declines in ER (serine 118) phosphorylation and Bcl-2 (p = 0.007). There were modest HER2 increases (p = 0.034, 29% tumours) and loss of any detectable EGFR phosphorylation (p = 0.024, 50% tumours) and MAP kinase (ERK1/2) phosphorylation (p = 0.019, 65% tumours) by 6 months. While ER remained low, there was some recovery of Ki67, Bcl-2 and (weakly) EGFR/MAPK activity in 45-67% patients at progression. Fulvestrant's anti-proliferative impact is related to DoR, but while commonly downregulating ER and indicators of its signaling and depleting EGFR/MAPK signaling in some patients, additional elements must determine response duration. Residual ER at fulvestrant relapse explains reported sensitivity to further endocrine therapies. Occasional modest treatment-induced HER2 and weakly detectable EGFR/HER2/MAPK signaling at relapse suggests targeting of such activity might have value alongside fulvestrant in some patients. However, unknown pathways must drive relapse in most. Ki67 has biomarker potential to predict fulvestrant outcome and as a quantitative measure of response.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEstradiolEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFemaleFulvestrantGene ExpressionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasm StagingPhosphorylationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorEstradiolEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFulvestrantProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronebiologybreast cancerendocrine resistancefulvestrant

Identifiers

PMID26178788
PMCPMC4879515
OpenAlexW1942535487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.