ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015
Properties of cells through life and death - an acoustic microscopy investigation.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visualisation of magnetic field-induced nanoparticle clusters and mechanical property changes in a breast phantom for inductive moderate hyperthermia.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of scanning acoustic microscopy for evaluation of MMP activation in multiple cancer cell lines with a smart probe.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2023Article
- Ultrasound-Responsive Smart Drug Delivery System of Lipid Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Scanning acoustic microscopy imaging of cellular structural and mechanical alterations from external stimuli.Heliyon · 2021Article
- The dance of the nanobubbles: detecting acoustic backscatter from sub-micron bubbles using ultra-high frequency acoustic microscopy.Nanoscale · 2020Article
- The Mechanics of Mitotic Cell Rounding.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- A Macro Lens-Based Optical System Design for Phototherapeutic Instrumentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Sizing biological cells using a microfluidic acoustic flow cytometer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- On-chip cell mechanophenotyping using phase modulated surface acoustic wave.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Simultaneous acoustic and photoacoustic microfluidic flow cytometry for label-free analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Mechanically Loading Cell/Hydrogel Constructs with Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for Bone Repair.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current methods to evaluate the status of a cell are largely focused on fluorescent identification of molecular biomarkers. The invasive nature of these methods - requiring either fixation, chemical dyes, genetic alteration, or a combination of these - prevents subsequent analysis of samples. In light of this limitation, studies have considered the use of physical markers to differentiate cell stages. Acoustic microscopy is an ultrahigh frequency (>100 MHz) ultrasound technology that can be used to calculate the mechanical and physical properties of biological cells in real-time, thereby evaluating cell stage in live cells without invasive biomarker evaluation. Using acoustic microscopy, MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells within the G1, G2, and metaphase phases of the proliferative cell cycle, in addition to early and late programmed cell death, were examined. Physical properties calculated include the cell height, sound speed, acoustic impedance, cell density, adiabatic bulk modulus, and the ultrasonic attenuation. A total of 290 cells were measured, 58 from each cell phase, assessed using fluorescent and phase contrast microscopy. Cells actively progressing from G1 to metaphase were marked by a 28% decrease in attenuation, in contrast to the induction of apoptosis from G1, which was marked by a significant 81% increase in attenuation. Furthermore late apoptotic cells separated into 2 distinct groups based on ultrasound attenuation, suggesting that presently-unidentified sub-stages may exist within late apoptosis. A methodology has been implemented for the identification of cell stages without the use of chemical dyes, fixation, or genetic manipulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.