Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26178464›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2015

Imaging Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mapping Present and Future Clinical Practice.

Aaron P Tansy, David S Liebeskind

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aaron P TansyDepartment of Neurology, Mount Sinai Comprehensive Stroke Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1052, New York, NY, 10029, USA, aaron.tansy@mssm.edu.
David S Liebeskind

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging is an increasingly key component of advances in stroke care. Its role in the success of multiple recently reported trials that have now driven new standards of practice highlights its expanding importance in acute stroke management. With significant gains already realized, routine practice only stands to benefit further from additional advances in imaging in the future. The degree to which imaging will impact stroke care, however, is uncertain and complex: multiple aspects of stroke research and its translation into updated practice contribute to it. In this article, a few of these critical issues and questions related to imaging and its potential, both present and future, to drive stroke care forward are addressed.

Indexed as

AngiographyBrain IschemiaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingStrokeTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.