Reply to LS Freedman et al.

Edward Archer, Steven N Blair

Abstract readLetterComment

In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

6citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

The Failure to Measure Dietary Intake Engendered a Fictional Discourse on Diet-Disease Relations.Frontiers in nutrition · 2018
Article
The use of implausible data without caveats is misleading.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2017
Article
The NHANES dietary data are physiologically implausible and inadmissible as scientific evidence.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2017
Article
Reported Dietary Intake, Disparity between the Reported Consumption and the Level Needed for Adequacy and Food Sources of Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium and Vitamin D in the Spanish Population: Findings from the ANIBES Study.Nutrients · 2017
Article
Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2016
Article
The Validity of US Nutritional Surveillance: USDA's Loss-Adjusted Food Availability Data Series 1971-2010.Current problems in cardiology
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
Implausible data, false memories, and the status quo in dietary assessment.2015
Comment on
Reply to E Archer and SN Blair.2015

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward ArcherFrom the Office of Energetics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (EA, e-mail archer1@uab.edu); and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SNB).

Steven N BlairFrom the Office of Energetics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (EA, e-mail archer1@uab.edu); and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SNB).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DietDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeHealthNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentNutrition PolicyFemaleHumansMaleNutrition Surveys

Identifiers

PMID26178034

DOI10.3945/an.115.009183

PMCPMC4496745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.