Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26178023›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2015

Overcoming consumer inertia to dietary guidance.

Densie Webb, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Best practices in nutrition science to earn and keep the public's trust.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Densie WebbHealth and Nutrition Communications, Austin, TX; and bredbenner@aesop.rutgers.edu.
Carol Byrd-BredbennerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite 35 y of dietary guidance, there has been no substantial shift in consumer compliance. Consumers report that they seek information on nutrition and healthy eating, but most are not paying attention to dietary recommendations. For guidance to be effective, it must be realistic. Even with increasingly detailed nutrition information and evidence that diet affects health outcomes, convenience and taste remain the strongest determinants of food choices. It is up to health educators to clear up confusion and give consumers control with nutrition messages that are realistic, positive, easy to understand, and actionable without an expectation that consumers will surrender foods they love.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHealth BehaviorNutrition PolicyAdolescentChildDietExerciseFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorFoodHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth StatusHumansInformation DisseminationLife Styleconsumerdietary guidelineshealth behaviorhealth informationnutrition policy

Identifiers

PMID26178023
PMCPMC4496743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.