Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26177814›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2015

X-ray crystallography over the past decade for novel drug discovery - where are we heading next?

Heping Zheng, Katarzyna B Handing, Matthew D Zimmerman, Ivan G Shabalin, Steven C Almo, Wladek Minor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Chemical Reactions in Living Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A Flexible, Modular Platform for Multidimensional Ion Mobility of Native-like Ions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heping ZhengUniversity of Virginia, Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics , 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908 , USA +1 434 243 6865 ; +1 434 243 2981 ; wladek@iwonka.med.virginia.edu.
Katarzyna B Handing
Matthew D Zimmerman
Ivan G Shabalin
Steven C Almo
Wladek Minor
Weatherford College · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Core H: MicrobiologyU54GM093342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CRONAN, JOHN E. · 2010 to 2015
$34.6M
Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM094585 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2010 to 2014
$33.7M
The NYSGRC: A Large Scale Center for PSI:BiologyU54GM094662 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI ALMO, STEVEN C. · 2010 to 2014
$32.6M
Integrated resource for reproducibility in macromolecular crystallographyU01HG008424 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG008424NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008424NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200026CNIGMS NIH HHS GM093342NIGMS NIH HHS GM094585NIGMS NIH HHS GM094662NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM093342NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094585NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMacromolecular X-ray crystallography has been the primary methodology for determining the three-dimensional structures of proteins, nucleic acids and viruses. Structural information has paved the way for structure-guided drug discovery and laid the foundations for structural bioinformatics. However, X-ray crystallography still has a few fundamental limitations, some of which may be overcome and complemented using emerging methods and technologies in other areas of structural biology. AREAS COVERED: This review describes how structural knowledge gained from X-ray crystallography has been used to advance other biophysical methods for structure determination (and vice versa). This article also covers current practices for integrating data generated by other biochemical and biophysical methods with those obtained from X-ray crystallography. Finally, the authors articulate their vision about how a combination of structural and biochemical/biophysical methods may improve our understanding of biological processes and interactions. EXPERT OPINION: X-ray crystallography has been, and will continue to serve as, the central source of experimental structural biology data used in the discovery of new drugs. However, other structural biology techniques are useful not only to overcome the major limitation of X-ray crystallography, but also to provide complementary structural data that is useful in drug discovery. The use of recent advancements in biochemical, spectroscopy and bioinformatics methods may revolutionize drug discovery, albeit only when these data are combined and analyzed with effective data management systems. Accurate and complete data management is crucial for developing experimental procedures that are robust and reproducible.

Indexed as

Drug DesignComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDrug DiscoveryHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsReproducibility of ResultsPharmaceutical Preparationsdata managementhybrid methodsprotein crystallographyreproducibilitystructural data interpretationtarget-based drug discovery

Identifiers

PMID26177814
PMCPMC4655606
OpenAlexW1879205842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.