Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26177804›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2016

A Critical Review of the Current Evidence for Measuring Drug Concentrations of First-Line Agents Used to Treat Tuberculosis in Children.

Kyle John Wilby, Sara Shabana, Mary H H Ensom, Fawziah Marra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle John WilbyCollege of Pharmacy, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. kjw@qu.edu.qa.
Sara ShabanaCollege of Pharmacy, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Mary H H EnsomFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Fawziah MarraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Qatar University · QAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis is a leading cause of infectious disease-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Additionally, treatment is complex with most patients requiring combination therapy of first-line agents for multiple months. Children are especially at risk from the medications used to treat tuberculosis and therefore interventions to optimize both efficacy and safety are needed. Protocols exist for therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis patients yet there is a gap in knowledge regarding the extent of any benefits achieved, especially in children. This review aims to summarize and evaluate literature reporting outcomes related to the measurement of drug concentrations of first-line agents used to treat tuberculosis (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) in children. Findings showed a lack of strong evidence to support therapeutic drug monitoring in children with tuberculosis. Standard weight-based dosing of first-line agents does not commonly achieve target concentrations yet the effect on clinical outcomes remains unclear. As such, therapeutic drug monitoring should not be recommended currently as a widespread practice for all children with tuberculosis. However, future research should assess any benefit in special populations such as those with relapsing or recurrent disease, or those presenting with adverse drug reactions.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug MonitoringHumansTuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID26177804
OpenAlexW927468184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.