Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26177390›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

No Added Value of Novel Biomarkers in the Diagnostic Assessment of Patients Suspected of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Judith M Poldervaart, Emma Röttger, Marieke S Dekker, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Peter W H M Verheggen, Evelyn A de Vrey, Thierry X Wildbergh, Arnoud W J van 't Hof, Arend Mosterd, Arno W Hoes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Judith M PoldervaartJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Emma RöttgerFaculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 98, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marieke S DekkerDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Clinics, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Nicolaas P A ZuithoffJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter W H M VerheggenDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Evelyn A de VreyDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Thierry X WildberghDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Arnoud W J van 't HofDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Clinics, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Arend MosterdDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Arno W HoesJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the availability of high-sensitive troponin (hs-cTnT), there is still room for improvement in the diagnostic assessment of patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Apart from serial biomarker testing, which is time-consuming, novel biomarkers like copeptin have been proposed to expedite the early diagnosis of suspected ACS in addition to hs-cTnT. We determined whether placenta derived growth factor (PlGF), soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), myoglobin, N-terminal prohormone B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP), growth-differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and copeptin improved early assessment of chest pain patients.

methodsThis prospective, single centre diagnostic FAME-ER study included patients presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of ACS. Blood was collected to measure biomarkers, notably, hs-cTnT was retrospectively assessed. Added value of markers was judged by increase in AUC using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 453 patients enrolled, 149 (33%) received a final diagnosis of ACS. Hs-cTnT had the highest diagnostic value in both univariable and multivariable analysis. PPVs of the biomarkers ranged from 23.5% (PlGF) to 77.9% (hs-cTnT), NPVs from 67.0% (PlGF) to 86.4% (hs-cTnT). Only myoglobin yielded diagnostic value in addition to clinical symptoms and electrocardiography (ECG) (AUC of clinical model 0.80) with AUC of 0.84 (p<0.001). However, addition of hs-cTnT was superior (AUC 0.89, p<0.001). Addition of the biomarkers to our clinical model and hs-cTnT did not or only marginally (GDF-15) improved diagnostic performance.

conclusionWhen assessing patients suspected of ACS, only myoglobin had added diagnostic value beyond clinical symptoms and ECG. However, when combined with hs-cTnT, it yields no additional diagnostic value. PlGF, sFlt-1, NT-proBNP, GDF-15 and copeptin had no added value to the clinical model or hs-cTnT.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkersElectrocardiographyFemaleGlycopeptidesGrowth Differentiation Factor 15HumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainOdds RatioPeptide FragmentsPlacenta Growth FactorBiomarkerscopeptinsFLT1 protein, humanGDF15 protein, humanGlycopeptidesGrowth Differentiation Factor 15Natriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancy Proteinspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Troponin TVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Identifiers

PMID26177390
PMCPMC4503345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.