Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26177063›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2015

Endothelial Network Formation Within Human Tissue-Engineered Skeletal Muscle.

Dacha Gholobova, Lieselot Decroix, Vicky Van Muylder, Linda Desender, Melanie Gerard, Gilles Carpentier, Herman Vandenburgh, Lieven Thorrez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Comprehensive Look at In Vitro Angiogenesis Image Analysis Software.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Biofabrication of 3D Human Muscle Model with Vascularization and Endomysium.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dacha Gholobova1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
Lieselot Decroix1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
Vicky Van Muylder1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
Linda Desender1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
Melanie Gerard1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
Gilles Carpentier2 Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Croissance Cellulaire, la Réparation et la Régénération Tissulaires (CRRET), Faculté des Sciences et Technologie, Université Paris-Est , Créteil, France .
Herman Vandenburgh3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island.
Lieven Thorrez1 Tissue Engineering Laboratory , Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium .
KU Leuven · BEBrown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size of in vitro engineered skeletal muscle tissue is limited due to the lack of a vascular network in vitro. In this article, we report tissue-engineered skeletal muscle consisting of human aligned myofibers with interspersed endothelial networks. We extend our bioartificial muscle (BAM) model by coculturing human muscle progenitor cells with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in a fibrin extracellular matrix (ECM). First, the optimal medium conditions for coculturing myoblasts with HUVECs were determined in a fusion assay. Endothelial growth medium proved to be the best compromise for the coculture, without affecting the myoblast fusion index. Second, both cell types were cocultured in a BAM maintained under tension to stimulate myofiber alignment. We then tested different total cell numbers containing 50% HUVECs and found that BAMs with a total cell number of 2 × 10(6) resulted in well-aligned and densely packed myofibers while allowing for improved interspersed endothelial network formation. Third, we compared different myoblast-HUVEC ratios. Including higher numbers of myoblasts improved endothelial network formation at lower total cell density; however, improvement of network characteristics reached a plateau when 1 × 10(6) or more myoblasts were present. Finally, addition of Matrigel to the fibrin ECM did not enhance overall myofiber and endothelial network formation. Therefore, in our BAM model, we suggest the use of a fibrin extracellular matrix containing 2 × 10(6) cells of which 50-70% are muscle cells. Optimizing these coculture conditions allows for a physiologically more relevant muscle model and paves the way toward engineering of larger in vitro muscle constructs.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesExtracellular MatrixFibrinHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsImmunohistochemistryMuscle, SkeletalMyoblasts, SkeletalTissue EngineeringFibrin

Identifiers

PMID26177063
PMCPMC4605445
OpenAlexW1865134586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.