Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26176779›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Assessment of Fecal Microflora Changes in Pigs Supplemented with Herbal Residue and Prebiotic.

Ashis Kumar Samanta, C Jayaram, N Jayapal, N Sondhi, A P Kolte, S Senani, M Sridhar, A Dhali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FermentedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dietary Supplementation with Ginger (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prebiotic Potential of Culinary Spices Used to Support Digestion and Bioabsorption.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashis Kumar SamantaFeed Additives and Nutraceuticals Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
C JayaramFeed Additives and Nutraceuticals Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
N JayapalFeed Additives and Nutraceuticals Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
N SondhiFeed Additives and Nutraceuticals Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
A P KolteOmics Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
S SenaniFeed Additives and Nutraceuticals Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
M SridharFermentation Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
A DhaliOmics Laboratory, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560030, India.
National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic usage in animals as a growth promoter is considered as public health issue due to its negative impact on consumer health and environment. The present study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of herbal residue (ginger, Zingiber officinale, dried rhizome powder) and prebiotic (inulin) as an alternative to antibiotics by comparing fecal microflora composition using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. The grower pigs were offered feed containing antibiotic (tetracycline), ginger and inulin separately and un-supplemented group served as control. The study revealed significant changes in the microbial abundance based on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among the groups. Presumptive identification of organisms was established based on the fragment length of OTUs generated with three restriction enzymes (MspI, Sau3AI and BsuRI). The abundance of OTUs representing Bacteroides intestinalis, Eubacterium oxidoreducens, Selonomonas sp., Methylobacterium sp. and Denitrobacter sp. was found significantly greater in inulin supplemented pigs. Similarly, the abundance of OTUs representing Bacteroides intestinalis, Selonomonas sp., and Phascolarcobacterium faecium was found significantly greater in ginger supplemented pigs. In contrast, the abundance of OTUs representing pathogenic microorganisms Atopostipes suicloacalis and Bartonella quintana str. Toulouse was significantly reduced in ginger and inulin supplemented pigs. The OTUs were found to be clustered under two major phylotypes; ginger-inulin and control-tetracycline. Additionally, the abundance of OTUs was similar in ginger and inulin supplemented pigs. The results suggest the potential of ginger and prebioticsto replace antibiotics in the diet of grower pig.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecesInulinMicrobiotaPlant ExtractsPrebioticsSus scrofaTetracyclineZingiber officinaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsInulinPlant ExtractsPrebioticsTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID26176779
PMCPMC4503616
OpenAlexW1515399068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.