Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26176644›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2016

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, active controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Exemptia; ZRC-3197) and adalimumab (Humira) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rajendrakumar H Jani, Rajiv Gupta, Girish Bhatia, Gaurav Rathi, Patnala Ashok Kumar, Reena Sharma, Uma Kumar, Liyakat A Gauri, Praveen Jadhav, Girishchandra Bartakke and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05172817 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Active Controlled Study to Compare PK & Safety of Biosimilar Adalimumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05172817 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Active Controlled Study to Compare PK & Safety of Biosimilar Adalimumab (Advixa) 40 mg/ 0.4 ml of Incepta Pharmaceuticals Ltd. With Humira 40 mg/ 0.4ml of Abbvie Ltd. in Healthy, Adult, Human Subject by Single Subcutaneous Injection Followed by Efficacy & Safety Study in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Developing Science and Health Initiatives, BangladeshRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsPharmacokinetics, Safety, Efficacy, Rheumatoid ArthritisArmsAdvixa (Adalimumab)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Monoclonal Antibody and Fusion Protein Biosimilars Across Therapeutic Areas: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Biosimilars for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biosimilars in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rajendrakumar H JaniClinical R & D, Cadila Healthcare Limited, The Zydus Group, Ahmedabad, India.
Rajiv GuptaMalpani Multispecialty Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Girish BhatiaMedipoint Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Gaurav RathiRathi Orthopaedic and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Patnala Ashok KumarDepartment of Orthopedics, Unit-2 King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, India.
Reena SharmaShalby Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Uma KumarClinical Immunology and Rheumatology Service, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Liyakat A GauriSP Medical College & Associated Group of Hospitals, Bikaner, India.
Praveen JadhavOmkar Heart Institute & Nursing Home & Rheumatology Clinic, Nasik, India.
Girishchandra BartakkeB J Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, India.
Vikram HaridasSushruta Multispecialty Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., Vidyanagar, Hubli, India.
Dinesh JainDMC & Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
Sanjeev K MendirattaClinical R & D, Cadila Healthcare Limited, The Zydus Group, Ahmedabad, India.
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INB. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INDayanand Medical College & Hospital · INKing George Hospital · INSardar Patel Medical College · INShalby Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn this study, efficacy, tolerability and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Exemptia; Zydus Cadila) was compared with reference adalimumab (Humira; AbbVie) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodIn this multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active controlled parallel arm study, 120 patients with moderate to severe RA were given 40 mg of either test adalimumab (Exemptia) or reference adalimumab (Humira) by subcutaneous route every other week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of responders in two tretament groups by American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) at week 12. The secondary endpoints were change in Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and proportion of patients with an ACR50 and ACR70 response in two treatment groups at week 12. Safety outcomes were also assessed.

resultsAfter 12 weeks, patients treated every other week with test adalimumab (Zydus Cadila) had statistically similar response rates as compared to reference adalimumab (AbbVie): ACR20 (82% vs. 79.2%; P > 0.7); ACR50 (46%, vs. 43.4%; P > 0.7); ACR70 (14% vs. 15.1%; P > 0.8). The change in DAS28-CRP score was -2.1 ± 1.09 and -2.1 ± 1.21, in test and reference products, respectively. It was statistically significant compared to baseline, but not significantly different between the two products. Three serious adverse events and no death was reported during the study. Both adalimumab preparations were safe and well tolerated in this study.

conclusionThe results demonstrated biosimilarity with respect to efficacy, tolerability and safety of test adalimumab (Exemptia) and reference adalimumab (Humira) in patients with moderate to severe RA.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsC-Reactive ProteinadalimumabbiosimilarExemptiaHumirarheumatoid arthritisZydus

Identifiers

PMID26176644
PMCPMC5215647
OpenAlexW1686511800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.