Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26176495›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2015

Animal models of respiratory syncytial virus infection and disease.

Randy E Sacco, Russell K Durbin, Joan E Durbin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modeling the Exposome in Murine Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Gingipain proteases from the bacteriumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lamb Model of RSV Infection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of a DRB3*011:01-restricted CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Randy E SaccoRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, United States.
Russell K DurbinCenter for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Joan E DurbinCenter for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States; Department of Pathology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States. Electronic address: durbinje@njms.rutgers.edu.

Funding

SUPPLEMENT TO: A Novel approach to RSV vaccinationR01AI088770 · NIAID · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DURBIN, JOAN E. · 2010 to 2015
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI088770NIAID NIH HHS R01AI088770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of human respiratory syncytial virus pathogenesis and immunity has been hampered by its exquisite host specificity, and the difficulties encountered in adapting this virus to a murine host. The reasons for this obstacle are not well understood, but appear to reflect, at least in part, the inability of the virus to block the interferon response in any but the human host. This review addresses some of the issues encountered in mouse models of respiratory syncytial virus infection, and describes the advantages and disadvantages of alternative model systems.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

Identifiers

PMID26176495
PMCPMC4699663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.