Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26176336›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Enhanced detection of post-transcriptional modifications using a mass-exclusion list strategy for RNA modification mapping by LC-MS/MS.

Xiaoyu Cao, Patrick A Limbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Direct sequencing of totalRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RNA-modifying enzymes and their function in a chromatin context.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoyu CaoRieveschl Laboratories for Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210172, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0172, United States.
Patrick A LimbachRieveschl Laboratories for Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210172, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0172, United States.
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

UPLC for Enhanced Mass Spectrometry of Modified RNAsR01GM058843 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI LIMBACH, PATRICK A · 1999 to 2025
$5.1M
Mass Spectrometry of Ribosomal RNA:Protein InteractionsR56GM058843 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI LIMBACH, PATRICK A · 2009 to 2009
$330k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58843NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058843NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM058843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a renewed appreciation for the dynamic nature of ribonucleic acid (RNA) modifications and for the impact of modified RNAs on organism health resulting in an increased emphasis on developing analytical methods capable of detecting modifications within specific RNA sequence contexts. Here we demonstrate that a DNA-based exclusion list enhances data dependent liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) detection of post-transcriptionally modified nucleosides within specific RNA sequences. This approach is possible because all post-transcriptional modifications of RNA, except pseudouridine, result in a mass increase in the canonical nucleoside undergoing chemical modification. Thus, DNA-based sequences reflect the state of the RNA prior to or in the absence of modification. The utility of this exclusion list strategy is demonstrated through the RNA modification mapping of total tRNAs from the bacteria Escherichia coli, Lactococcus lactis, and Streptomyces griseus. Creation of a DNA-based exclusion list is shown to consistently enhance the number of detected modified ribonuclease (RNase) digestion products by ∼20%. All modified RNase digestion products that were detected during standard data dependent acquisition (DDA) LC-MS/MS were also detected when the DNA-based exclusion list was used. Consequently, the increase in detected modified RNase digestion products is attributed to new experimental information only obtained when using the exclusion list. This exclusion list strategy should be broadly applicable to any class of RNA and improves the utility of mass spectrometry approaches for discovery-based analyses of RNA modifications, such as are required for studies of the epitranscriptome.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEscherichia coliLactococcus lactisRibonucleasesRNA, BacterialRNA, TransferStreptomyces griseusRibonucleasesRNA, BacterialRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID26176336
PMCPMC4542202
OpenAlexW2320052337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.