Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26176235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Chemically Modified Plastic Tube for High Volume Removal and Collection of Circulating Tumor Cells.

Angelo Gaitas, Gwangseong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelo GaitasKytaro, Inc., Miami, Florida, 33199, United States of America; Florida International University (FIU), Miami, Florida, 33199, United States of America.
Gwangseong KimKytaro, Inc., Miami, Florida, 33199, United States of America; Florida International University (FIU), Miami, Florida, 33199, United States of America.

Funding

A research and drug development tool for the real time in vitro study of single cR44GM084520 · NIGMS · KYTARO, INC. · PI GAITAS, ANGELO · 2013 to 2015
$1.3M
Novel single cell disease markers with a hybrid AFM scanning piezo-thermal probeR43GM084520 · NIGMS · KYTARO, INC. · PI GAITAS, ANGELO · 2008 to 2009
$400k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM084520NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM084520NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM084520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this preliminary effort, we use a commercially available and chemically modified tube to selectively capture circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from the blood stream by immobilizing human anti-EpCAM antibodies on the tube's interior surface. We describe the requisite and critical steps required to modify a tube into a cancer cell-capturing device. Using these simple modifications, we were able to capture or entrap about 85% of cancer cells from suspension and 44% of cancer cells from spiked whole blood. We also found that the percentage of cells captured was dependent on the tube's length and also the number of cancer cells present. It is our strong belief that with the utilization of appropriate tube lengths and procedures, we can ensure capture and removal of nearly the entire CTC population in whole blood. Importantly after a patient's entire blood volume has circulated through the tube, the tube can then be trypsinized to release the captured live CTCs for further analysis and testing.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ImmobilizedAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell SeparationEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFlow CytometryHumansMaleNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProstatic NeoplasmsAntibodies, ImmobilizedAntigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

Identifiers

PMID26176235
PMCPMC4503618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.