Corrigendum: The Human Neonatal Gut Microbiome: A Brief Review.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sampling frequency matters: mapping of the healthy infants' gut microbiome during the first year of life.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025
   Article
2. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life and Its Implications on Childhood Health.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2019
   Review
3. Gut and Lung Microbiota in Preterm Infants: Immunological Modulation and Implication in Neonatal Outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
   Review
4. Diversified gut microbiota in newborns of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.PloS one · 2018
   Article
5. New microbes and new infections · 2017
   Article
6. Irritable bowel syndrome, the microbiota and the gut-brain axis.Gut microbes · 2016
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The human neonatal gut microbiome: a brief review.2015

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as