Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175889›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2015

A comparison of the use of clomiphene citrate and letrozole in patients undergoing IVF with the objective of producing only one or two embryos.

B I Rose, D C Laky, S D Rose

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. OocyteTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018
    Review
  6. Exploring the Potential ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B I RoseInfertility Solutions, P. C., 1275 South Cedar Crest Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18103. ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's University Health Network, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015.
D C LakyInfertility Solutions, P. C., 1275 South Cedar Crest Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18103.
S D RoseInfertility Solutions, P. C., 1275 South Cedar Crest Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18103.
Cedar Crest College · USSt. Luke's University Health Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe objective of this study was to compare the use of clomiphene citrate and letrozole in an IVF setting in which the objective was to produce only one or two embryos. Either clomiphene citrate or letrozole was used in conjunction with gonadotropins without the use of GnRH antagonists.

methodsSixty-two patients received either clomiphene citrate or letrozole with low dose gonadotropins in 128 non-randomized treatment cycles. HCG was given when one follicle was at least 17 mm. Oocyte retrieval was done 34 hours later and fertilization was performed using ICSI.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the number of large follicles produced, oocytes fertilized, endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rates, or delivery rates in patients taking letrozole compared to clomiphene citrate. More mature oocytes were retrieved after clomiphene citrate, but a subset analysis of patients undergoing both treatments did not support this difference. The only statistically different finding in both analyses was the peak estradiol levels during treatment, which averaged 516 pg/ml with letrozole and 797 pg/ml with clomiphene citrate (p = 0.005). Overall, the cancellation rate due to a premature LH surge was 5%. An average of 2.8 mature oocytes were recovered, 2.1 oocytes fertilized and 1.6 embryos were transferred. The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 25% (95% confidence interval 17.7% to 33.3%) and the overall live birth rate per transfer was 19.2% (95% confidence interval of 11.6% to 26.8%).

conclusionsOther than peak estradiol levels, there were no clinically significant differences when letrozole or clomiphene citrate was used for mild ovarian stimulation for IVF. There were only rare cancellations because of premature LH surges.

Indexed as

clomiphene citrateIVFletrozolemini-IVFminimal stimulation IVFnatural cycle IVF

Identifiers

PMID26175889
PMCPMC4498169
OpenAlexW2395640949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.