Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175753›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015

Implications of pleiotropy: challenges and opportunities for mining Big Data in biomedicine.

Can Yang, Cong Li, Qian Wang, Dongjun Chung, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-to-phenome research in rats: progress and perspectives.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrating natural history collections and comparative genomics to study the genetic architecture of convergent evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Big Data Analytics in Medicine and Healthcare.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Can YangDepartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong, Hong Kong ; Hong Kong Baptist University Institute of Research and Continuing Education Shenzhen, China.
Cong LiProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.
Qian WangProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.
Dongjun ChungDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Hongyu ZhaoProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA ; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health New Haven, CT, USA ; Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA ; VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center West Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
Statistical Models for Genetic Studies, Using Network and Integrative AnalysisR01GM122078 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, DONGJUN · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleiotropy arises when a locus influences multiple traits. Rich GWAS findings of various traits in the past decade reveal many examples of this phenomenon, suggesting the wide existence of pleiotropic effects. What underlies this phenomenon is the biological connection among seemingly unrelated traits/diseases. Characterizing the molecular mechanisms of pleiotropy not only helps to explain the relationship between diseases, but may also contribute to novel insights concerning the pathological mechanism of each specific disease, leading to better disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment. However, most pleiotropic effects remain elusive because their functional roles have not been systematically examined. A systematic investigation requires availability of qualified measurements at multilayered biological processes (e.g., transcription and translation). The rise of Big Data in biomedicine, such as high-quality multi-omics data, biomedical imaging data and electronic medical records of patients, offers us an unprecedented opportunity to investigate pleiotropy. There will be a great need of computationally efficient and statistically rigorous methods for integrative analysis of these Big Data in biomedicine. In this review, we outline many opportunities and challenges in methodology developments for systematic analysis of pleiotropy, and highlight its implications on disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

data integrationfunctional annotationgenome-wide association studies (GWAS)mining Big Data in biomedicinepleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID26175753
PMCPMC4485215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.