Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Quantitative analysis of proteome extracted from barley crowns grown under different drought conditions.

Pavel Vítámvás, Milan O Urban, Zbynek Škodáček, Klára Kosová, Iva Pitelková, Jan Vítámvás, Jenny Renaut, Ilja T Prášil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application of Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics to Barley Research.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pavel VítámvásDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Milan O UrbanDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Zbynek ŠkodáčekDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Klára KosováDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Iva PitelkováDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan VítámvásDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic ; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague, Czech Republic.
Jenny RenautDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Ilja T PrášilDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Plant Stress Biology and Biotechnology, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Crop Research Institute · CZCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barley cultivar Amulet was used to study the quantitative proteome changes through different drought conditions utilizing two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Plants were cultivated for 10 days under different drought conditions. To obtain control and differentially drought-treated plants, the soil water content was kept at 65, 35, and 30% of soil water capacity (SWC), respectively. Osmotic potential, water saturation deficit, (13)C discrimination, and dehydrin accumulation were monitored during sampling of the crowns for proteome analysis. Analysis of the 2D-DIGE gels revealed 105 differentially abundant spots; most were differentially abundant between the controls and drought-treated plants, and 25 spots displayed changes between both drought conditions. Seventy-six protein spots were successfully identified by tandem mass spectrometry. The most frequent functional categories of the identified proteins can be put into the groups of: stress-associated proteins, amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, as well as DNA and RNA regulation and processing. Their possible role in the response of barley to drought stress is discussed. Our study has shown that under drought conditions barley cv. Amulet decreased its growth and developmental rates, displayed a shift from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism, and exhibited increased levels of several protective proteins. Comparison of the two drought treatments revealed plant acclimation to milder drought (35% SWC); but plant damage under more severe drought treatment (30% SWC). The results obtained revealed that cv. Amulet is sensitive to drought stress. Additionally, four spots revealing a continuous and significant increase with decreasing SWC (UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase, glutathione peroxidase, and two non-identified) could be good candidates for testing of their protein phenotyping capacity together with proteins that were significantly distinguished in both drought treatments.

Indexed as

crowndroughtHordeum vulgarephenotyping candidateproteomics

Identifiers

PMID26175745
PMCPMC4485253
OpenAlexW1516744805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.