Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Proteomic analysis of apoplastic fluid of Coffea arabica leaves highlights novel biomarkers for resistance against Hemileia vastatrix.

Leonor Guerra-Guimarães, Rita Tenente, Carla Pinheiro, Inês Chaves, Maria do Céu Silva, Fernando M H Cardoso, Sébastien Planchon, Danielle R Barros, Jenny Renaut, Cândido P Ricardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Apoplast: A Key Player in Plant Survival.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Leonor Guerra-GuimarãesCentro de Investigação das Ferrugens do Cafeeiro, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical Oeiras, Portugal ; Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa, Portugal.
Rita TenenteCentro de Investigação das Ferrugens do Cafeeiro, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical Oeiras, Portugal.
Carla PinheiroInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL) Oeiras, Portugal ; Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal.
Inês ChavesInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL) Oeiras, Portugal ; Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica Oeiras, Portugal.
Maria do Céu SilvaCentro de Investigação das Ferrugens do Cafeeiro, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical Oeiras, Portugal ; Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa, Portugal.
Fernando M H CardosoGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisboa, Portugal.
Sébastien PlanchonLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Danielle R BarrosCentro de Investigação das Ferrugens do Cafeeiro, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical Oeiras, Portugal ; Department de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas, Brasil.
Jenny RenautLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Cândido P RicardoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL) Oeiras, Portugal.
Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A proteomic analysis of the apoplastic fluid (APF) of coffee leaves was conducted to investigate the cellular processes associated with incompatible (resistant) and compatible (susceptible) Coffea arabica-Hemileia vastatrix interactions, during the 24-96 hai period. The APF proteins were extracted by leaf vacuum infiltration and protein profiles were obtained by 2-DE. The comparative analysis of the gels revealed 210 polypeptide spots whose volume changed in abundance between samples (control, resistant and susceptible) during the 24-96 hai period. The proteins identified were involved mainly in protein degradation, cell wall metabolism and stress/defense responses, most of them being hydrolases (around 70%), particularly sugar hydrolases and peptidases/proteases. The changes in the APF proteome along the infection process revealed two distinct phases of defense responses, an initial/basal one (24-48 hai) and a late/specific one (72-96 hai). Compared to susceptibility, resistance was associated with a higher number of proteins, which was more evident in the late/specific phase. Proteins involved in the resistance response were mainly, glycohydrolases of the cell wall, serine proteases and pathogen related-like proteins (PR-proteins), suggesting that some of these proteins could be putative candidates for resistant markers of coffee to H. vastatrix. Antibodies were produced against chitinase, pectin methylesterase, serine carboxypeptidase, reticuline oxidase and subtilase and by an immunodetection assay it was observed an increase of these proteins in the resistant sample. With this methodology we have identified proteins that are candidate markers of resistance and that will be useful in coffee breeding programs to assist in the selection of cultivars with resistance to H. vastatrix.

Indexed as

2-DEantibody productioncoffee leaf rust (CLR)cytologyELISA assayMALDI-TOF/TOF MS

Identifiers

PMID26175744
PMCPMC4484983
OpenAlexW1596434082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.