Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175541›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Joseph A O'Donoghue, Jeremy C Durack, Serge K Lyashchenko, Sarah M Cheal, Volkan Beylergil, Robert A Lefkowitz, Jorge A Carrasquillo, Danny F Martinez, Alex Mak Fung and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A Feasibility Study Showing [Molecular imaging and biology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Radionuclides Landscape in Prostate Cancer Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neeta Pandit-TaskarDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. pandit-n@mskcc.org.
Joseph A O'DonoghueDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jeremy C DurackDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Serge K LyashchenkoMolecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sarah M ChealDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Volkan BeylergilDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert A LefkowitzDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Jorge A CarrasquilloDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Danny F MartinezDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alex Mak FungDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stephen B SolomonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Mithat GönenDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Glenn HellerDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Massimo LodaDepartment of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham & Women's Hospital; and Broad Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
David M NanusDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Scott T TagawaDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Jarett L FeldmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joseph R OsborneDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Jason S LewisDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wolfgang A WeberDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Neil H BanderDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Howard I ScherDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Steven M LarsonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael J MorrisDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandard imaging for assessing osseous metastases in advanced prostate cancer remains focused on altered bone metabolism and is inadequate for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. We performed a first-in-human phase I/II study of (89)Zr-DFO-huJ591 ((89)Zr-J591) PET/CT immunoscintigraphy to assess performance characteristics for detecting metastases compared with conventional imaging modalities (CIM) and pathology. EXPERIMENTAL

designFifty patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers were injected with 5 mCi of (89)Zr-J591. Whole-body PET/CT scans were obtained, and images were analyzed for tumor visualization. Comparison was made to contemporaneously obtained bone scintigraphy and cross-sectional imaging on a lesion-by-lesion basis and with biopsies of metastatic sites.

resultsMedian standardized uptake value for (89)Zr-J591-positive bone lesions (n = 491) was 8.9 and for soft-tissue lesions (n = 90), it was 4.8 (P < 0.00003). (89)Zr-J591 detected 491 osseous sites compared with 339 by MDP and 90 soft-tissue lesions compared with 124 by computed tomography (CT). Compared with all CIMs combined, (89)Zr-J591 detected an additional 99 osseous sites. Forty-six lesions (21 bone and 25 soft tissue) were biopsied in 34 patients; 18 of 19 (89)Zr-J591-positive osseous sites and 14 of 16 (89)Zr-J591-positive soft tissue sites were positive for prostate cancer. The overall accuracy of (89)Zr-J591 was 95.2% (20 of 21) for osseous lesions and 60% (15 of 25) for soft-tissue lesions.

conclusions(89)Zr-J591 imaging demonstrated superior targeting of bone lesions relative to CIMs. Targeting soft-tissue lesions was less optimal, although (89)Zr-J591 had similar accuracy as individual CIMs. This study will provide benchmark data for comparing performance of proposed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting agents for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorRadiopharmaceuticalsBone NeoplasmsHumansMaleMolecular ImagingNeoplasm MetastasisPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID26175541
PMCPMC4668231
OpenAlexW1544486867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.