ArticleThe Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology2015
Corrigendum.
Article in The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaston J, Bartlett S, Klemuk SA, Thibeault SL. Formulation and characterization of a porous, elastomeric biomaterial for vocal fold tissue engineering research. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;123(12):866-874. (Original DOI: 10.1177/0003489414539131) In the "Conclusion" section of the abstract, the sentence "Twenty-µm diameter pores are ideal for cell seeding, and a range of mechanical properties indicates that the higher mass concentration PEU formulations are best suited for mimicking the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissue for in vitro research. " is incorrect. The correct sentence should read "Twenty-µm diameter pores are ideal for cell seeding, and a range of mechanical properties indicates that the lower mass concentration PEU formulations are best suited for mimicking the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissue for in vitro research." This is not a significant change to the authors' findings.
Identifiers
26175527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.