Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26175494›Full record

ReviewScience signaling2015

Reserve stem cells: Differentiated cells reprogram to fuel repair, metaplasia, and neoplasia in the adult gastrointestinal tract.

Jason C Mills, Owen J Sansom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science signaling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Colonic epithelial regeneration shapes susceptibility tobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Regulation of STK38 by autophagy governs YAP1 activity during paligenosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Be like water, my cells: cell plasticity and the art of transformation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason C MillsDivision of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine, Pathology & Immunology, and Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. jmills@wustl.edu o.sansom@beatson.gla.ac.uk.
Owen J SansomCancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK. jmills@wustl.edu o.sansom@beatson.gla.ac.uk.
Cancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
REGULATION OF ATROPHY-INDUCED PROGENITOR CELLS IN THE GASTRIC CORPUSR01DK094989 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Jason C Mills · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
MECHANISMS OF CHIEF CELL DEDIFFERENTIATIONR01DK105129 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Jason C Mills · 2015 to 2026
$5.4M
Cancer Research UK 21139NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094989NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK094989NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been known that differentiated cells can switch fates, especially in vitro, but only recently has there been a critical mass of publications describing the mechanisms adult, postmitotic cells use in vivo to reverse their differentiation state. We propose that this sort of cellular reprogramming is a fundamental cellular process akin to apoptosis or mitosis. Because reprogramming can invoke regenerative cells from mature cells, it is critical to the long-term maintenance of tissues like the pancreas, which encounter large insults during adulthood but lack constitutively active adult stem cells to repair the damage. However, even in tissues with adult stem cells, like the stomach and intestine, reprogramming may allow mature cells to serve as reserve ("quiescent") stem cells when normal stem cells are compromised. We propose that the potential downside to reprogramming is that it increases risk for cancers that occur late in adulthood. Mature, long-lived cells may have years of exposure to mutagens. Mutations that affect the physiological function of differentiated, postmitotic cells may lead to apoptosis, but mutations in genes that govern proliferation might not be selected against. Hence, reprogramming with reentry into the cell cycle might unmask those mutations, causing an irreversible progenitor-like, proliferative state. We review recent evidence showing that reprogramming fuels irreversible metaplastic and precancerous proliferation in the stomach and pancreas. Finally, we illustrate how we think reprogrammed differentiated cells are likely candidates as cells of origin for cancers of the intestine.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell LineageGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinesMitosisNeoplasmsPancreasRegenerationStem CellsStomachTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26175494
PMCPMC4858190
OpenAlexW2158203062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.